Two Constitutions: A Comparison
ADA Text Version
US Constitution featuring the words We the PeopleIn many ways, the U.S. and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement… both provide for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate… both seek a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government… and both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government. But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to reverse and avoid. The framers of the U.S. Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action.
The highest mountain peak is Mount Whitney
Answer:
Human migration involves the movement of people from one place to another with intentions of settling, permanently or temporarily, at a new location.
Explanation:
Persons moving from their home due to forced displacement (such as a natural disaster or civil disturbance) may be described as displaced persons or, if remaining in the home country, internally-displaced persons. A person who seeks refuge in another country can, if the reason for leaving the home country is political, religious, or another form of persecution, make a formal application to that country where refuge is sought and is then usually described[by whom?] as an asylum seeker. If this application is successful this person's legal status becomes that of a refugee.
It was first the email system, and then the internet which gave us access to information despite taking longer time to respond, and then websites which helped business and private individuals, then mobile phones making communication easier, then social media where its about describing yourself and communicating through photos and stuff, then smartphones which not only helped in the communication system but also online banking, online shopping etc, and then Skype with which we can now have a video conference with colleagues and families no matter where they are.
Answer:
John Locke rejected self-interest as a justification of natural law.
Explanation:
next time look if your answer is on google.
