I do not believe a comma is necessary in this sentence at all. In fact, if you were to insert a comma after the word grazed (as you maybe tempted to do) it could change the meaning of the sentence. If you meant the lions were oblivious of the presence of the gazelles, you would insert a comma after grazed. But if you meant the gazelles were oblivious of the presence of the lions, you would leave the comma out.
The answer is D. One aspect of T.S Eliot's poetry that makes it so difficult is his usage of many literary elusions.
The writer/author uses an appeal to emotion by portraying her family as abandoned by policy makers
I don't what it says can you right your question in the comments