Answer:
D. Is as vivid in its details of personal life as that gathered.
Explanation:
<em>Written in ink or engraved by stylus, more than 2,000 letters and documents on wooden tablets excavated at the site of the old roman fort at Vindolanda in northern England are yielding a historical account of the military garrison in the first and second centuries that </em><em><u>are so vivid in their details about personal life as they are</u></em><em> from Pompeii </em>
The sentence is dealing with comparisons of historical accounts and items from Vindolanda and Pompeii. The relative pronoun "that" is always related to the preceding noun/ noun phrase, in this case, the "historical account". So, the verb agreement will be singular. Thus, option D is the right answer.
Option A and B are wrong for it's use of plural 'are'.
Option C, for the use of 'their' which is also plural.
Option E is a wrong sentence construction 'as is that'.
B. Population. All of the rest would be characteristics
Answer: Adversity is a state of hardship, difficulty, or misfortune that one deals with in life. There are six types of adversity that one can face, and facing adversities in life can break or make a person. Sorry its not i sentence hopefully i helped
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the correct punctuation for the sentence will be:
The first car was a machine that had three wheels and was powered by steam. It was built in France in 1769, it was heavy and moved very slow.
Many factories produced steam-driven cars during the 1890s and 1900s but the disadvantage of steam was that water had to be boiled before the car could go. Nowadays, cars work on gas, electric, and even on water, which prove that science never stop inventing.
Punctuation simply means the signs that's ate useful as it shows a reader how a sentence is being constructed.
Learn more about punctuations on:
brainly.com/question/1224394
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>