Answer:
A claim made to rebut a previous claim.
Explanation:
It is basically another claim brought to oppose the claim that was previously established.
For example:
"Social media makes teenagers lazy, unresponsive, feel bad about themselves, and short-tempered."
A counter-claim to this would be: "Actually, social media can be very beneficial for teenagers as it helps them communicate better with others."
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.
That author believes that the situation is without hope, so he was no reason to continue one.
Answer:In Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird, Mr. Raymond tells Scout that when Dill grows up "he won't cry about the simple hell people give other people--without even thinking. Cry about the hell white people give colored folks, without even stopping to think that they're people too!
