Who introduced the conflict perspective in sociology?

History

2 answers:

Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The best answer to the question: Who introduced the conflict perspective in sociology, would be: B: Karl Marx.

Explanation:

Conflict theory was first introduced by Karl Marx and with it he argued that individuals, and also groups, in society, engage with one another on the basis of conflict and not collaboration and understanding. This theory therefore states that it is almost inherent in people, especially in groups, to fight each other for the upper hand on control of resources and power. What is more, those groups that show different forms of advantage, or power, over another, will exert that power to obtain their interest and objectives. Conflict theorists also believe that conflict is a necessary part of life, and society, in order to generate change, and in turn, conflict will also lead to dialoguing between the conflicting parts, with the one having the upper hand imposing its ideals over the other.

valina [46]3 years ago

6 0

I believe the answer is B.Karl Marx.

You might be interested in

Which of the following was an outcome of the Yalta conference

riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

The answer is b

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Which amendment do you feel is the most important and why? Make sure you describe which amendment, what it says, and why you bel

SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer: Eighth Amendment

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

5. What was one of the key terms of the Treaty of Paris?

Naily [24]

On September 3, 1783, three definitive treaties were signed—between Britain and the United States in Paris (the Treaty of Paris) and between Britain and France and Spain, respectively, at Versailles.

3 0

3 years ago

Which two civilizations controlled the greatest amount of land in 200 ce

Ratling [72]

The Romans, as well as the middle eastern, such as the Ottomans and the Turks.

5 0

3 years ago

why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri

Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0

3 years ago