Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

12

If omar company applies overhead to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours and job 3 took 120 hours, how much overhead should b

e applied to that job?
a.$960
b.$360
c.$528
d.$288

1 answer:

telo118 [61]3 years ago

6 0

You multiply 3 by 120 to get $360 the answer is b. $360

You might be interested in

Sammy created a new logo for his client to use on the company website and office stationery. However, the logo became a blur whe

pychu [463]

Answer:

Sammy needs to use a program and design the ad using density independent pixels.

Explanation:

Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that in the future Sammy needs to use a program and design the ad using density independent pixels. This will allow the design to correctly scale up and down by adding the correct ration or pixels needed so that the image is always as clear as originally intended. This will prevent such scenarios as this one.

7 0

3 years ago

You are considering a stock investment in one of two firms (NoEquity, Inc., and NoDebt, Inc.), both of which operate in the same

Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

A. NoEquity $18.27million

NoDebt $22.75million

B. NoEquity 28.11%

NoDebt 35%

Explanation:

A. Calculation to determine the net income

NoEquity Inc., NoDebt Inc.,

Operating income $32.5 million $32.5 million

Less: Interest $6.4 million $0

($64m × 0.1)

Taxable income $ 26.10million $32.5 million

Less: Taxes (30%) ($7.83million) ($9.75million)

NET INCOME $18.27million $22.75million

Therefore The Net income for the two firms are :

NoEquity $18.27million

NoDebt $22.75million

B. Calculation to determine the Return on assets

NoEquity

Return on assets =$18.27million/$65 million

Return on assets =0.2811*100

Return on assets =28.11%

NoDebt

Return on assets = $22.75million/$65 million

Return on assets =0.35*100

Return on assets =35%

Therefore The return on assets for the two firm are:

NoEquity 28.11%

NoDebt 35%

3 0

3 years ago

?an officer conducting a lineup should allow the defense attorney at the lineup to do all but which of the following?

myrzilka [38]

A<span>n officer conducting a lineup should allow the defense attorney at the lineup to do all but B. control any part of the proceedings.
This is what the officer himself or herself is doing - the defense attorney is not allowed to do such a thing. However, they can passively or actively observe the proceedings, take notes, or just record the proceedings in order to revise them later on.
</span>

3 0

3 years ago

You have just purchased a share of stock for $ 19.09. The company is expected to pay a dividend of $ 0.51 per share in exactly o

frozen [14]

Answer:

$20.64

Explanation:

Use the rate of return formula to solve for the new price;

r = ( P1 +Div1 -P0)/P0

whereby;

r = rate of return = 10.8% or 0.108 as a decimal

Div1 = Next year's dividend amount = $0.51

P1 = next year's stock price =?

P0 = Current stock price = $19.09

Next, plug in the numbers to the formula;

0.108 = (P1 + 0.51 - 19.09) / 19.09

Multiply both sides by 19.09;

2.0617 = P1 -18.58

Add 18.58 on both sides;

2.0617 + 18.58 = P1

20.64 = P1

Therefore, you need to sell the share at $20.64

8 0

3 years ago

A minor bought an Ernie Banks baseball card from a baseball card store. The card was marked $12, and the inexperienced clerk who

krok68 [10]

Answer: No. The owner cannot get the card back because of the minor’s lack of capacity

Explanation:

From the information given, we are told that a minor bought a baseball card from a baseball card store for $12, even though the price was $1,200.

It should be noted that the owner cannot get the card back based on the minor’s lack of capacity. In this case, the idea is to protect the minor, therefore the minor who bought the baseball card is the one that can disaffirm or cancel the contract. In this case, the adults are bound to the contract.

The baseball card will only be gotten if the minor wishes to give it back.

4 0

3 years ago