Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p1 be the population proportion for the first population
and p2 be the population proportion for the second population
Then
p1 = p2
p1 ≠ p2
Test statistic can be found usin the equation:
where
- p1 is the sample population proportion for the first population
- p2 is the sample population proportion for the second population
- p is the pool proportion of p1 and p2
- n1 is the sample size of the first population
- n2 is the sample size of the second population.
As |p1-p2| gets smaller, the value of the <em>test statistic</em> gets smaller. Thus the probability of its being extreme gets smaller. This means its p-value gets higher.
As the<em> p-value</em> gets higher, the null hypothesis is less likely be rejected.
irrational number, any real number that cannot be expressed as the quotient of two integers.
Any number that can be written as a fraction with integers is called a rational number . For example, 17 and −34 are rational numbers. (Note that there is more than one way to write the same rational number as a ratio of integers.
1st Is rational
2nd one is irrational
3rd is irrational
4th is rational
1 apple + 1 apple = 2 apples
I think the answer is 14 6/3
<span>The survey had a sample and response bias. The survey only randomly selected sophomore students, when it needed to be a thorough survey of children in the LA school district, so the sample size is neither large enough or relevant. Secondly, because the survey was administered by the parents of the students, the students surveyed will be more likely to over-report their activity level.</span>
