Answer:
he added wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
(x,y)=(x+4,y+7)
(4,5)
(4+4, 5+7)
(8, 12)
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- y -9 = 2(x -1) . . . point-slope form
- y = 2x +7 . . . . slope-intercept form
- 2x -y = -7 . . . . standard form
Step-by-step explanation:
Perhaps you want the equation of the line that goes through these two points.
The slope of the line can be found using the formula ...
m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)
m = (9 -3)/(1 -(-2)) = 6/3 = 2
We can use one of the points to write the equation in point-slope form:
y -k = m(x -h) . . . . . . . . line with slope m through point (h, k)
For slope 2 and point (1, 9) the equation is ...
y -9 = 2(x -1) . . . . equation in point-slope form
__
We can eliminate parentheses and get y by itself to put the equation into slope-intercept form.
y -9 = 2x -2
y = 2x +7 . . . . . . equation in slope-intercept form
__
With a little further rearranging, we can put this into standard form. We can get that by adding -7-y to both sides of the equation.
2x -y = -7 . . . . . equation in standard form
Answer: B) Neither Kelly or Daniel is correct.
A geometric proof is a series of logical reasonings that, starting from a hypothesis, lead to a thesis, using a sequence of statements, axioms, and theorems.
Looking at Kelly's proof, we can say that she is not right. Indeed, she uses the thesis, what she wants to prove, as a justification for her statements.
On the contrary, Daniel uses definitions and properties as a justification for his statements. Although, he does not use the correct justification for statements 1 and 2. Indeed, ∠1 + ∠2 = 180 because they are a linear pair, as well as ∠1 and ∠4.
A linear pair is a pair of adjacent angles formed when two lines intersect, while the supplementary angles definition states that two angles are supplementary when they add to 180 degrees without being necessary next to each other. Since Daniel does not know the effective measure of the angles, he cannot use the definition of supplementary angles.
Hence, neither Kelly or Daniel is correct.

You have

so showing that

amounts to the same as showing that

.
As

, you have

. By comparison, then, it follows that

at a faster rate, which means

must diverge.
The answer will be B) 42%