Answer:
c:astronomers learn more about Sedna
Explanation:
The section that will most likely contain this information is the vocabulary. The vocabulary section is the part that includes words that are unknown or new to the organizer...
After reading the poem "Sea Rose" by Hilda Doolittle, we can answer the questions in the following manner:
Part A
3. The sea rose, even with its acrid scent, is more endearing than the traditional rose.
Part B
1. "more precious / than a wet rose / single on a stem-"
- In her poem "Sea Rose," Hilda Doolittle praises the qualities of a sea rose over those of a regular rose.
- We all know roses: how beautiful and fragrant they are. They are often associated with love, tenderness, and softness.
- The sea rose, on the other hand, is "marred", "harsh", "meagre".
- It does not look as good as the regular rose, but there is where its beauty and importance lie.
- The sea rose is strong - it has survived a great ordeal. Nature itself has beaten it, "flung" and "caught" it.
- The sea rose, with all its flaws, ends up being more precious than other roses.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/12868634?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The given circumstance mattered as it helped to develop the theme of inhumanity.
Yes, I think Steinback is right to think so.
Explanation:
The passage is taken from John Steinback's novel entitled 'The Grapes of Wrath.' The novel is set during the time of Great Depression and Dust Bowl.
One of the theme of that the author has portrayed in the novel is inhumanity of man over man. This is a repetitive theme found in the novel during the time of Great Depression and Dust Bowl.
In the given passage, Steinback is illustrating the same theme of inhumanity of man over man. The narrator is mourning over the fact that people who did not struggle to grow the crop were fed instead those who struggled. During the time of Great Depression, rich landowners in California became so inhumane that they hired immigrants to cultivate their farms but did not gave anything to them to eat. They were cruel to them and treated them with barbariously. For Steinback, this situation mattered as it helped to develop thhe theme of inhumanity.
Yes, I think Steinback was right to think so because who did not labour for the food were well fed and those who worked hard to reap the harvest were left empty stomach.
