B. 82 :) hope this helps xx
Answer: flavors of ice cream
Explanation: Subjectivism theory sees values of what is morally right or wrong like the "flavors of ice cream" i.e values of what is right or wrong is just a matter of what one personally prefers.
This theory holds that there is nothing like objective moral truth and and the only standard of judgement should be that of individuals rather than communal i.e the standard of judgement should be the individual moral conscience.
<span>As indicated
by the article, Coca-Cola did not react quickly enough to alleviate and pacify
its purchasers that its Coke items are harmless and lawful. As indicated by
Coke's </span>social
responsibility commitments, the assertions of legislators spread quickly through India.
Nonetheless, the organization neglected to acknowledge how quick news went to.
Rather than looking to recover the trust and support from its clients, Coke
concentrated excessively on different workarounds. Coca-Cola shaped advisory groups
in India and the US. The advisory groups invested energy to run the tests, besides;
Coke was quiet to its shoppers. As specified by Mr. Seth, Coke's Indian
advertising expert, in the Indian culture, "Here individuals translate silence
as crime". Buyers needed to hear the official clarification from Coca-Cola
instantly and they would not like to hold up later. At long last, Coca-Cola
safeguarded their organization by claiming that different organizations have
comparative issues like Coke.
