Answer:
- If they really want to go together, Pat and Mark could make a one-week trip to the beach, and spend the second-week hiking in the mountains. They could also choose to go on separate trips, so each can spent the entire vacation in their desired destination. Or they could go together to one of those places and agree to let the other person choose the destination in a future trip.
- Given that it´s Pat´s money, She should be able to decide, and Mark can enjoy the result of whatever she chooses. Pat could accept Mark´s choice by making sure he brings something to the table, like being in charge of organizing the vacation, and make it to a place Pat really would like to go. They could also split the money and make a small trip as well as buying either the computer or the printer, but not both.
- Pat could try to change her behavior and use the opportunity to ask Mark to change something she dislikes about him. Or, they could just accept that Pat is just not an organized person, find something Mark is not good at as well. Let´s say, ironing his own clothes. They could agree that each of them will take charge of what the other person won´t do.
- It´s difficult to find a win-win resolution to this case because workers have a legal right to assemble and fight for fair wages. Management could concede on a lower raise as long as they can offer some other perks, like providing food for their employers.
Explanation:
Personally, win-win strategies help me understand that when resolving conflicts one must consider the other side´s needs and be willing to compromise. I usually become a little stubborn when in such a situation, focusing on how I´m right and others should accept that. Trying to come with win-win solutions will probably help me get better results and keep relationships healthy.
Answer:
It would be necessary to focus on the objective information, and also to separate the influence of the present cultural environment from the past events.
Explanation:
In the study of past events, it would be necessary to take into account the idea of being objective towards the information about historical events. Since, it is known that the perception of the present surrounding environment and the social interaction lived by the researcher, could affect the study of past events,. It would be important to draw a line in order to separate the information corresponding to each epoch of time without modifying history by the influence of the present.
Americans are better at recognizing anger, fear, and sadness compared to Japanese but accuracy for happiness or surprise does not differ.
Japanese people tend to shy away from overt displays of emotion, and rarely smile or frown with their mouths Yuki explained because the Japanese culture tends to emphasize conformity humbleness and emotional suppression, traits that are thought to promote better relationships. May 10, 2007
In a large number of studies,3, 8, 9 some aspects of emotion have been shown to be culturally different because emotion is not only biologically determined but also influenced by environment and social or cultural situations. The role of culture in emotion experience has also been stressed in sociology theories.
Learn more about Japanese here
brainly.com/question/510537
#SPJ4
C- the supply of money to increase
The utilitarian <span>ethical theory is closest to peter singer's when it comes to famine relief. Peter Singer argued that people with money are morally obligated to contribute part of their wealth to be delivered for famine relief.
But this principle is similar Utilitarianism that is based the purpose to fully use all resources to its maximum value.</span>
