In 1898, the Spanish-American War broke out. The US became a powerhouse in Asia thanks to this conflict. With the annexation of Guam and the Philippines, the US expanded its sway over Asia. A peace treaty was concluded between the two nations following the conflict.
As a result of the United States' success in the war, the Spanish were forced to renounce their claims to Cuba and hand up control of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the United States in a peace treaty. During the battle, the US also annexed Hawaii, an independent state.
The US gained ownership of and/or influence over a large number of additional areas as a result of its victory in the Spanish American War. A new far-flung empire was formed as a result of these and other geographical acquisitions.
To learn more about Spanish-American War
brainly.com/question/2827989
#SPJ4
The citizens of both the American and French Revolution uprise to try to gain more power. In the French Revolution the all the citizens want to do is to end the unfair class system. In the American Revolution citizens want to break away and gain independence from great Britain.
Answer:
<em><u>d</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Eliza</u></em><em><u>beth</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Van</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Lew</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>was</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>valuable</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>legendary</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>spy</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>in</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Civil</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>War</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Explanation:
In "The Dark Game," the central idea of the section about Elizabeth Van Lew was that <em>Elizabeth</em><em> </em><em>Van</em><em> </em><em>Lew</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>valuable</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>legendary</em><em> </em><em>spy</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>Civil</em><em> </em><em>War</em><em>.</em>
The pros of an embargo are usually that the country which has it imposed changes their ways. Since embargos are usually introduced in cases where a nation violates human rights or prevents democracy or similar things, the pros are that the embargo is a motivation for the government that depends on trade to change their ways to become more democratic.
Cons are that they are often ineffective for various reasons. For example, a country may be fully self-sufficient so it doesn't care if it has an embargo since it can fulfill the needs of the people regardless. Another is also if the people are willing to suffer from being in an embargo out of spite for those who introduced the embargo so they don't change their ways.<span />