1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
13

________ percent of top executives state that listening is the most important skill needed to get things done in the workplace.

Social Studies
1 answer:
Alona [7]3 years ago
6 0
The answer to this question is 80 Percent.
Listening will increase your awareness on all the problems that become a hindrance for the company's goals.
Not only that By improving this skill, it will be a lot easier to communicate with other team members on how to deal with the hindrance.
You might be interested in
List three strategies used to manage<br> the fisheries industry?
____ [38]

this is actually like six but its cool right?

Develop fishery management plans.

Convene committees and advisory panels and conduct public meetings.

Develop research priorities.

Select fishery management options.

Set annual catch limits based on best available science.

Develop and implement rebuilding plans.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Great Zimbabwe was a powerful kingdom of the Zulu peoples.
Mkey [24]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Now that Big Brother has decided that I must wear a seatbelt when I ride in a car, how long will it take before I have to wear a
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer: This is fallacy called "straw man"

Explanation:

Straw man is one kind of logical fallacy. It consists in missrepresenting someones's argument to make it easier to attack.

7 0
3 years ago
Write about the Pros of Indian Judiciary system (for a debate)? (urgent pls)
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The collegium system must not see itself as being above the safeguards and measures for transparency, accountability and demographic representation that apply to India’s pillars of democracy.

In September 2019, Chief Justice of Madras High Court Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani resigned after the collegium upheld their decision to transfer her to the high court of Meghalaya (one of the smallest in the country). Justice Tahilramani was the senior-most high-court judge in the country. The members of the bar associations across Tamil Nadu protested against this move and carried “a one-day court boycott.” In addition, in Maharashtra's Latur, about 2,000 lawyers boycotted court proceedings to protest the transfer. The collegium responded by saying that they have “cogent reasons” for the transfer, and will reveal them if required.

At the heart of this controversy is the functioning of the collegium system, which makes decisions about appointments and transfers in the higher judiciary. In February 2020, former Supreme Court judge and member of the collegium from 2018–2019, Arjan Kumar Sikri, said that far from a “scientific study” about candidates, “most times, we [the collegium] go by “our impression” when appointing judges [to high courts and the Supreme Court].”

The collegium system is headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. India’s Constitution originally stipulated that the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts would be appointed by the President based on a process of “consultation” with senior judges. The present collegium system emerged later based on three key rulings. In 1981, the “First Judges Case” ruled that the process of consultation with the CJI and other judges did not require a consensus about recommendations. Essentially, the ruling gave the central government “primacy in judicial appointments.” In 1993, the “Second Judges Case” overturned this decision and introduced the collegium system, arguing that “consultation” required “concurrence.” Specifically, the ruling said that the process of appointing judges would be based on “an institutional opinion formed in consultation with the two senior-most judges in the Supreme Court” and the CJI. In 1998, the “Third Judges Case” ruled that the collegium would be a five-member body, establishing the system that is most similar to the one currently being followed.

This reading list details how the current system can be reformed.

Opaque and Unaccountable System

C Raj Kumar writes that the lack of information about the appointment of judges, including the criteria based on which the judges make their choice, is “the most persuasive criticism of the collegium system.”

   Without a transparent process of the appointment of judges, the collegium system will not have the credibility and the legitimacy for it to be accepted by all stakeholders within the legal system. Transparency will not be established merely by stating that the members of the collegium will act in a transparent manner. It will have to be demonstrated by the process that the judiciary adopts in the selection of judges.

The lack of transparency and the absence of formal criteria have multiple worrying implications. Presently, there is no structured process to investigate if a judge who is recommended by the collegium has any conflict of interests. This is important in the context where the

   … collegium has been fraught with serious allegations of different types of alleged conflict of interest among the members of the collegium and the individuals they have selected to become judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. There is an urgent need for the collegium to formulate a detailed set of rules and regulations that will govern the determination of conflict of interest among the members of the collegium who are involved in the selection of judges.

Social Background of Judges  

Alok Prasanna Kumar identifies that the collegium system prefers practising lawyers rather than appointing and promoting “judges of the subordinate judiciary,” which often comprises a diverse pool of candidates.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are toddlers possessive and say "no" often according to erikson?
Lynna [10]
Toddlers at the age of three and below  want to choose and decide for themselves and autonomy is fostered when parents permits reasonable free choice and do not force the child to do something he/she doesn't want.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What duties did peasants still owe to nobles in france
    5·1 answer
  • Beans can only be roasted by commercial roasting machines
    10·2 answers
  • Any system of government in which rule is by the people is called a. an autocracy. c. a monarchy. b. a democracy. d. an oligarch
    8·1 answer
  • The ............................... is divided by all the continents???
    7·1 answer
  • The colonies more important as a source for blank as Europe became more industrialized
    11·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from the US Constitution. Which portion of the text reflects the Enlightenment idea of popular sovereignty?
    11·1 answer
  • In an opinion poll, the degree to which an opinion is subject to change is known as its
    5·2 answers
  • what are the benefits of being connected to digital media 24/7?(not social media) answer within 3 or 4 sentences. DO NOT search
    12·1 answer
  • Why are intermediate products excluded from macroeconomic calculations of GDP?
    5·1 answer
  • Voltage-gated (voltage-dependent) channels and antiport carriers are both types of?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!