Answer:
A. Federal law always supercedes state law.
Explanation:
Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case which held that the Congress of the United States of America had authority, jurisdiction and power to regulate any interstate commerce with respect to the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
In New York city, the state legislature granted a monopoly to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton an exclusive navigation rights or privileges of operating on all New York state waters with boats that are being moved either by steam or fire, for a time frame of thirty (30) years. Aaron Orgedon was the governor.
In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled that in business disputes, federal law always supercedes state law. It held that the permission granted to the state, New York city was monopolistic and as such was not permitted.
<span>This was the case of "Holt v. Hobbs". In this case, Holt, a practicing Salafi Muslim, claimed that the imposition of facial hair restrictions were an imposition based upon the Religious Land Use and Imprisoned Persons Act. The 9-0 majority found that the prison had not exhausted all available measures for accommodating Mr. Holt and that the grooming policy was an imposition against his religious needs.</span>
Starting school later in the day!
<span>an oceanic plate collides with a continental plate</span>
Answer:
A person in a communal relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>non contingent </em>effect of helping. While a person in an exchange relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>contingent</em> effect of helping others.
Explanation:
<em>Communal relationships</em> are closely knitted relationships, such that occurs within family and partners. In a communal relationship, helping does not come with future expected benefits (non contingent) . Giving is done with an objective of ensuring the other person's need is met.
In an <em>Exchange relationship</em>, the effect of helping comes with future benefits of repayments. Giving is done with an objective of some future repayment. This type of relationship occurs among business partners. 'If person A does person B a favor today, it is expected that person B will repay the favor to person A in future.
