Answer:
12.5%
Explanation:
A portfolio has $2,800 invested in stock A
$3,900 is invested in stock B
The expected return of stock A is 9%
= 9/100
= 0.09
The expected return of stock B is 15%
= 15/100
= 0.15
The first step is to calculate the total value
= $2,800+$3,900
= $6,700
Therefore, the expected return on the portfolio can be calculated as follows
= (2,800/6,700)×0.09 + (3,900/6,700)×0.15
= 0.4179×0.09 + 0.5820×0.15
= 0.03761 + 0.0873
= 0.1249×100
= 12.5%
Hence the expected return on the portfolio is 12.5%
<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Which of the following has the biggest impact on consumer goods during war times?
a. Consumers deferring purchases in hopes of a better deal
b. High interest rates
c. Low inflation
d. High inflation
<u>Answer:</u>
The biggest impact on consumer goods during war times was High inflation
<u>Explanation:</u>
Inflation raised during or as an immediate outcome of these struggles of stock markets endured dull subsequent termination of the war. The government demanded to execute price and wage restrictions in acknowledgment of inflation which had risen due to the extra inducement that was generated by government spending.
Distinctly, both using and financing continued building subsequent the war; nevertheless, the growth was beneath the course rate before the war. Prices, influenced by the rate of inflation, commonly affect consumer spending on goods significantly.
Answer:
I could not find the exact details related to this question so here is a similar question to guide you.
Goodwill = Acquisition Price - Net book value (Investee)
= 75,000 - ( Assets - Liabilities)
= 75,000 - ( 90,000 - 40,000)
= $25,000
Identifiable noncurrent assets is overstated by $10,000 however. This will have to be adjusted for tax and then removed from Goodwill to find the Net goodwill that should be reported in the investor's consolidated balance sheet prepared immediately after this business combination.
= 10,000 ( 1 - 40%)
= $6,000
Net Goodwill = 25,000 - 6,000
<h2>
= $19,000</h2>
Answer:
d. beta did a better job of explaining the returns than standard deviation
Explanation:
Beta measures the systemic risk associated with the particular investment, it do not compute the total risk associated, which is more logical.
Standard deviation computes the total risk associated.
Some risk is natural, like the risk of floods, natural calamities, earthquake, etc:
That risk shall not counted as for comparison as that is associated universally. Further, the risk associated with particular factors like bankruptcy of a company, or some legal case issue of a company are precisely described by beta coefficient.
Thus, beta provides better details about explaining the returns.
Answer:
B. decision styles are consistent among top managers
Explanation:
Decision making styles differ between managers. Many managers exercise autocratic style which is authoritative wherein very limited inputs from the subordinates are taken and there is little scope for constructive advises.
In heuristic style, the strategies help managers to take clear cut decisions in a prompt manner. In such a form, decisions are arrived at quickly.
Managerial decision making methods differ from manager to manager and are an outcome of managers own judgement and demeanor.
Hence it is evident from above points that decision styles are not consistent among top managers.
