1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
castortr0y [4]
3 years ago
15

Both yellow journalism and the explosion on the battleship Maine contributed to the U.S. decision to go to war against Spain. Wh

at was the reason for going to war against Spain?
A) to prevent Spain from attacking Florida
B) to protect U.S. investments in Cuba
C) to keep Spain from attacking Venezuela
D) to stop Cuban rebels from overthrowing Spanish rule
History
2 answers:
12345 [234]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h2>B. To protect US investments in Cuba </h2>

Explanation:

Spanish American war was armed conflict between US and Spain n 1898.  The US intervened in the Cuban war of independence after the explosion USS Maine in Havana Harbour. The major battles were fought in Cuba and Philippines. After the war US became the dominant power in the Caribbean region and acquired Spanish Territories in the Caribbean region. As a result of the war US gets Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippine Island to US for 20 million dollars.

President McKinley didn't resisted going to war but he gave in to public pressure and declared war on 25th April 1898. The war ended on August 12, 1898.

just olya [345]3 years ago
5 0

The answer is A) to prevent Spain from attacking Florida

You might be interested in
A study of courts and law
Sladkaya [172]
The correct answer is law and society studies, while in other countries it is known as socio-legal studies.

In the U.S., the study of the law is known as law and society studies, while in Europe, the study of the law is known as socio-legal studies. The Law is a body of regulations, which is created and maintained by social or governmental bodies to maintain behavior in the system or countries.
7 0
3 years ago
Who are seen as liabilties in italy
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

Not me sir.

Explanation:

If I havn't than no explanation XD dumb Brainly

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1920s, where did most of the population of Texas live?
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

US Population Rank US Pop Rank City 1920 Population 41: San Antonio: 161,379 42: Dallas: 158,976 45: Houston: 138,276 65: Fort Worth: 106,482 89: El Paso: 77,560.

hope it helped    :D

4 0
3 years ago
In the 1960s, American men had to register for the draft if they were between the ages of
likoan [24]
18 and 25 would be the answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do scientist think contributed to the development of language?
scoundrel [369]

Answer: Read vvv

Explanation:

As it’s impossible to track words and linguistic ability directly through the archaeological record, scientists have previously attempted to study the evolution of language through “proxy indicator” skills, such as early art or the ability to make more sophisticated tools. The authors of the new study, a team of scientists led by Thomas Morgan, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, took a different approach. Rather than consider toolmaking solely a proxy for language ability, the team explored how language might help modern humans learn to make tools using the same techniques their early ancestors did.

In the experiment, the scientists took 184 volunteers—students from the University of St. Andrews in the United Kingdom—and broke them into five groups; archaeologists then instructed the first person in the technique known as Oldowan stone-knapping. Oldowan tools, named for the famous Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, where archaeologists Louis and Mary Leakey discovered the implements in the 1930s, were widespread among early humans between 2.5 and 1.8 million years ago. The technique consisted of striking a stone “hammer” against a stone “core” to flake off pieces and create a sharp edge that could be used to cut, chop and scrape; the flakes themselves were also sharp enough to use for cutting plants and butchering animals.

Each of the five groups proceeded in different ways: In the first, a pair of volunteers were simply given the stone “core,” a hammer and some examples of flakes, then told to go about their business without guidance. In the second group, the second student learned how to make the tools by simply watching his fellow volunteer (who had been taught the technique) and trying to duplicate his actions without communication. In the third, the volunteers showed each other what they were doing but with no talking or gesturing. The fourth group was allowed to gesture and point, while in the fifth group, the “teacher” was allowed to say whatever he or she wanted to the other volunteers. In the next round of the experiment, the learner became the teacher, creating five different “chains” of transmission; in all, the volunteers produced more than 6,000 stone flakes.

According to the results of the study, published this week in the journal Nature Communications, the first group predictably had very little success when left to their own devices. What was striking, however, was that performance improved very little among those who simply watched their fellow volunteers make the tools. Only those who were allowed to gesture and talk while teaching performed significantly better than the baseline the scientists had established. By one measurement, gesturing doubled the likelihood that a student would produce a viable stone flake in a single strike, while verbal teaching quadrupled that likelihood.

Taking their results into consideration, researchers concluded that early humans might have developed the beginnings of spoken language–known as a proto-language–in order to successfully teach and pass along the ability to make the stone tools they needed for their survival. Such capacity to communicate would have been necessary, they suggest, for our ancestors to make the rapid leap from the Oldowan toolmaking process to more advanced stone tools, which occurred around 2 million years ago.

Dietrich Stout, an archaeologist at Emory University in Atlanta, praised the new study’s innovation, telling Science magazine that “a major strength of the paper is that it adopts an experimental approach to questions that have otherwise largely been addressed through intuition or common sense.” Still, Stout and other scientists urge caution before taking the study’s conclusions at face value without more direct proof. For one thing, the study’s conclusions don’t take into account that the modern volunteers have grown up with language, so it could be expected that they would learn more effectively with it than without; this may not have been true for early humans.

hoped it helped :D

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What cultural aspects influenced americans in the 1950's?
    8·1 answer
  • What does it mean to honor or respect as a god?
    9·1 answer
  • What were the main negative effects of the economic policies of European colonizers?
    11·2 answers
  • The first book Old testament poetry is named for:
    9·1 answer
  • What was the main idea of this u.n declaration?
    6·1 answer
  • Asap i need help
    13·2 answers
  • Cuantas décadas tiene el año 1650
    7·1 answer
  • Ito ay pag aaral sa katangiang pisikal ng daigdig​
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think the final version of the US constitution created a political system that gives too much too little or just enough p
    13·1 answer
  • What was a lasting effect of the American Revolution?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!