1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
3 years ago
15

What made world war 2 a total war

History
1 answer:
elena-s [515]3 years ago
5 0
The answer to this question is:

What made world war 2 a total war<span>"The war effort required American civilians to contribute"

Hoped This Helped, </span><span>Davidtbeardenov0i5p
Your Welcome :)</span>
You might be interested in
What was the usual settlement pattern of immigrants?
nevsk [136]
Close to people of similar ethnicities, cultures, and religions
6 0
3 years ago
Which country was part of the Axis Powers until it was invaded by Germany?
kirza4 [7]

Russia was part of the Axis Powers until it was invaded by Germany.

Option: A

Explanation:

Russia was previously part of Axis power. The Axis power was signed by tri parties Germany, Italy and Japan. Later it was followed by Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania. Before signing Axis power Germany and Russia was friend countries.

Finland was not a part Axis power or allies party. Hitler suddenly attacked on Russia. From then Russia became the enemy country of Germany. In 1941 it was happened. At the start of World war II this strategic attack was done by Germany on Russia.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which sentence from the article provides the BEST support for the statement above?
Digiron [165]

Answer:B)

Explanation: I think its b i may be wrong

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why didn't early Portuguese and Dutch explorers decide to create settlements in Australia? A. They didn't think the land was sui
kirza4 [7]
B. Local natives successfully defeated Dutch and Portuguese forces.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What change in government policy took place at the end of World War I?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the government prevented from doing by the articles
    11·2 answers
  • A democratic system in which the named “ruler” is a symbolic head of state, and power rests in the hands of elected officials.
    15·1 answer
  • Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence?
    11·1 answer
  • The passage below about debate is from a 1964 Supreme Court ruling. Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and w
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following choices best describes the purpose of the Sugar Act? The British wanted to allow the colonists to pay low
    8·2 answers
  • What can Congress and the Supreme Court do to limit the power of the Presidency?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following correctly completes line #3 in the chart above?
    15·2 answers
  • Why were these clauses probably inserted of Treaty of Versailles
    5·1 answer
  • In 1860, the population of Texas was about 600,000. Approximately what fraction of the population were slaves?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!