Answer:
The correct answer is A) Bias by selection or omission
Explanation:
A new media outlet is expected to be unbiased in its reporting and present a neutral side to every story. This is how viewers judge the news organisation be fair and balanced.
In this case, the fact that a protest was covered but no one was interviewed, is an example of Bias by selection or omission. They obviously omitted the view points of the protesters and presented their own version of the story.
However, answers B and C are wrong because we have no evidence that they change the choice or tone of words or the source of the news itself.
At the point when Germanic tribes attacked into the Balkans, Gaul, and Spain, the Roman Empire had issues in enrolling enough officers to battle against the burdens from the tribes. In the mid-third century, the state was compelled to utilize Germans from outside the Empire to attack the influx of tribes. The troopers were just willing to work for pay since they didn't recognize Roman cultures or traditions nor did they have any devotion to the Empire.
It is usually thought that a fine is a payment made to the employer for damage done to him by the worker. That is not true. A fine and compensation for damage are two different things. If a worker does some damage to another worker, the latter may demand compensation for the damage (e.g., for a piece of cloth which has been spoiled), but can not fine him. Similarly, if one factory owner does damage to another (e.g., fails to deliver goods on time), the latter can demand compensation, but he cannot fine the first factory owner.
i hope this helps!!
Answer:
A) A constitutional monarchy
Explanation:
The Glorious Revolution was a bloodless revolution that lasted from 1688 to 1689. It resulted in the deposition of James II and the accession of his daughter Mary II and her husband William. The Parliament was summoned and the crown was offered with a Declaration of Rights to William and Mary.
The power of the crown was reduced, with that, they could not suspend laws anymore.
The great awakening taught people to challenge religious and political authority and break from churches and to create new ones if necessary versus creating a sense of Democracy.
