I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. The statement about nonfiction writing that is accurate would be nonfiction writers have to stick to things that actually happened. It <span>is a genre of writing that uses </span>literary<span> styles and techniques to create factually accurate narratives.</span>
Answer:
The role of men and women in society has changed remarkably in the last decades especially from 1960 onwards. Until that moment there was a clear difference in the role of men and women, the man being the voice of command in the family circle and the provider of economic stability, because he was generally and in most cases the only one who worked, while women, on the other hand, were dedicated to housework and caring for the family's children, exercising only the role of a housewife and totally depending on their husbands in financial terms.
With the advent of feminist movements, there was a situation of gradual social, political and economic equality between men and women that until then had not occurred. Thus, the role of the man remained stable, while that of the woman began to be equated more and more to that of men, at the same time that both began to share the responsibilities regarding the care of the family and the household chores.
It's based on a boy the author saw during her day out with her child
Hello. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
According to the reading of your question, we can see that the author uses persuasive techniques related to something that is painful for him. In that case, we can consider that he uses pathos as a persuasive technique. This is because pathos is a resource that explores the emotion of the reader in relation to the topic addressed, this makes the reader sympathize with the author's words and intensifying the tone promoted in the text.
Answer:
no. 3 is correct answer of your question ^_^
<em>We</em><em> </em><em>didn't </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>visit</em><em> </em><em>Lumbini </em><em>.</em>