The law of moral cause-and-effect is called the law of Karma.
Depending on whoever you ask, there are several opinions on what karma really is. While some adhere to the traditional interpretation rooted in Eastern religions, others interpret it more in line with a Western conception of good and evil. This can consequently result in various interpretations of how karma functions in life. This law states that whatever ideas or energy one put out, one receives back, whether it's positive or negative. One must embody and merit the things they want in order to obtain them. It's the idea that you harvest what one sows. Memories and wants are shaped by karma, which then dictates how one lives. The karmic software that controls one's existence is comprised of actions, memories, and desires.
To learn more about the Law of Karma refer to:
brainly.com/question/18175497
#SPJ1
Answer:
Rationing
Explanation:
Rationing is a method that is used to distribute a resource in a period of extreme scarcity. Example of rationing would be what the soviet union did during the communism era.
At that time, the lack of production in that country make foods became extremely hard to get. So the government only allow the citizens to obtain small amount of food in order to ensure that all citizens can have something to eat.
Answer: I want to say D. All of above.
Explanation:
Because not everyone knew how to read stars
Answer:
A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.
Explanation:
The researchers' maintained a point of view that, the low levels of the drugs found in the water poses no significant threat to public health.
Therefore their reasoning would be most strengthened by the answer "A" chosen above because it implies that;
low levels of the drugs have been present in water over time, and yet, no health effects have been detected previously. Therefore, even if the technology to detect such low levels of the drugs is now available, it shouldn't change the fact that such levels of the drug is still not a significant health hazard.
Answer:
observational learning
Explanation:
Trevor observed someone being a shot in a television show, then learned that behavior from seeing it. It'd be the same as learning how to play a game by watching someone else do it, or learning about marine life through a nature documentary.
