Answer:
The question is not complete, but I will be explaining one or two things here so that you will be able to tackle a similar question.
Explanation:
According to researches conducted by neuroscientists, it has been observed that children process language since birth( even since when they are in the womb).
According to the question, Christopher is a 5-month-old American and he is exposed solely to English language. If Christopher hears another different language, he would know that the new language is different what the normal(English) that he has been listening to for some times. Christopher would have been processing the information of the English language, so he will be able to know that he is now listening to a different language. Infants have some kind of ''phonetic stimuli' controlled by the Brain.
CONCLUSION: INFANTS ARE ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE SOUNDS OF ANY LANGUAGE.
Answer:
C.
Explanation: I can only answer this to my best ability being as i dont have the text. But i know its not going to be D nor b
Answer:
d. Antisocial personality disorder
Explanation:
Antisocial personality disorder: In abnormal psychology, the term antisocial personality disorder is referred to as a mental condition or mental illness that is explained in terms of an individual consisting of a long-term pattern of exploiting, manipulating, or violating the rights of the other person without showing any remorse or guilt.
An individual experiencing antisocial personality disorder often finds difficulty in maintaining relationships at work and is considered to be criminal as well.
Symptoms: Persistent lying to exploit others, using charm to manipulate another person for personal gain, disregard for right and wrong, etc.
Causes: Environmental factors, genetic factors, etc.
In the question above, Ruth's behavior is consistent with that seen in antisocial personality disorder.
Watson believed that psychology should primarily be scientific observable behavior.
Dubbing
Explanation:
<u>It is a common technique used in cinema to paste one person's voice over another to produce a desirable effect including the emulation of a proper voice for a specific role as is the case here.</u>
This was done to be as authentic about Welles' voice as was possible and not to break the immersion of the audience watching the film and familiar with Orson Welles.
