1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
3 years ago
15

Labeling theory is considered a sub-theory of the __________ perspective.

Social Studies
1 answer:
xeze [42]3 years ago
3 0

So the labelling theory is a social interactionist theory of sociology. The labelling theory explains that over time a person can accept what they have been labelled and enter the self fulfilling prophecy which leads them to accept and become that label. For explain if a teacher labels a student as badly behaved and treats them like they are badly behaved, over time they become badly behaved.

You might be interested in
1 Point
Elenna [48]

Gleick is thankful to Gutenberg for inventing the printing press.  

Explanation:

Johannes Gutenberg (1398–1468), the inventor of typology through type. He was a resident of Mainz in Wejermani. He created the printing press in 1739, which is considered a great invention. He also created a movable type. The Bible printed by him is famous as Gutenberg Bible. Around 1439 AD, Strasbourg tested its printing invention.

Thus the first printed book is 'Constan Missal' which was published around 1450. Only three copies are available. One is in Munich (Germany) the other in Zurich (Switzerland) and the third in New York. In addition, a Bible was also printed by Gutenberg.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Explain social system becomes less efficient​
Sladkaya [172]

the marginal social benefit of producing and consuming another unit equals the marginal social cost.

4 0
3 years ago
Policy makers and activists have shown concern about the gap between "information haves" and "information have-nots" they've cal
Cloud [144]

The answer is information gaps.  These are missing information necessary to complete a job. The United States give out with fears in the 1990s about a gap between "information haves" and "information have-nots" by ratification of a new act that endowed the connection of every insttution and archive to the Internet.

4 0
3 years ago
for many years many history books claimed that “ columbus discovered america “ . why do you think native americas might disagree
hjlf
Well, Columbus never actually came to America. His ship made land in the Bahamas and Cuba. He thought these islands were Asian islands because the people of Spain were unaware of the Americas, and so he wanted gold. He returned to his country and came back with more men. And killed a lot of people.
Anyway, for the sake of the American education system, I'm assuming the word the teacher is wanting is something like "recognized".
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It can be inferred that colonists disliked the Townshend Acts more than the Sugar Act because it -
    13·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP PLEASE!!!!!! 20 POINTS!!!! PLEASE AND THANK YOU!!
    14·1 answer
  • The defense of paying bribes or other questionable practices in the other countries is called
    5·1 answer
  • 7.) Which adjective best describes the Islamic caliphate under the Abbasids compared to the caliphate under the Umayyads?
    5·2 answers
  • Currently, about _____ of all american adults are married.
    6·1 answer
  • The Fifth Amendment talks about the rights of people who are accused of crimes. For example, it says that a person cannot be put
    6·2 answers
  • The study of rare or unusual phenomena is most easily done through the use of the
    7·1 answer
  • Which states do most us citizens retire to?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is /the major function (s)of e-government​
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone help please?<br> Explain how the merit system benefited Chinese society.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!