Answer:
<h3>The notions of victim facilitation, precipitation, and provocation focuses on the victim's responsibility in prevailing a crime.</h3>
Explanation:
The notion of victim facilitation states that certain crimes occur because of victim's negligence. The victim is held equally responsible in the crime because of carelessness or by his/her mistakes.
The notion of precipitation applies to the acts that the victim contributes in making himself/herself a victim of a crime. For instance, when one tries to rob an armed person and in that process he/she gets shot, the notion of precipitation applies here.
The notion of provocation applies to those victims who gets victimized when they attack someone and the other person attacks them back severely in self-defense.
All three notions apply to the broader theme of shared responsibility. They are used in describing a victim's role in aiding a crime to occur. However, the notion of victim facilitation does not equally share the same concept of direct consequence as the other two notions. The notion of victim facilitation often justifies victim's role as accidental and unintentional. On the other hand, the two other notions both contributes directly as a consequence of their acts.
Answer:
The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution. The idea behind the Bill of Rights was to insure certain freedoms and rights to the citizens of America. It put limits on what the government could do and control.
Explanation:
Answer:
Numerous statistics indicate positive trends in the midstream and downstream oil markets, led by the domestic petroleum refining industry [1]. Domestic capacity has expanded, and there is a robust product-import market. Increased refining efficiencies have moderated crude-oil price rises since the 1970s. Products have been reformulated to improve environmental performance.
Higher refining margins in recent years have led to planned capacity additions, domestically and internationally. Few if any new refineries are likely to be built in the United States, however. This is because (among other factors) the financial disadvantage of building from scratch versus incrementally expanding existing capacity, the issue of permits aside. In all, the price- and profit-driven market process is ably at work, promising to bring the issue of pricing petroleum products back again to the issue of the globally-set price of crude oil.
Rodney can best be described as a <u>Revolutionary-Crusader</u> leader as he challenged the status quo and has been guided by adaptation by taking over the position of the divisional head.
<h3>Who is a leader?</h3>
A leader is a person who sets an example for their subordinates and guides them well by applying one of the leadership styles.
Revolutionary-Crusader is one of the archetypes in leadership. It refers to a leader who has challenged the status quo, that is, the current scenario of social or political concerns, and advocated a sense of adaptation among people.
Therefore, Rodney has been viewed as a Revolutionary-Crusader leader in accordance with the leadership archetypes.
Learn more about the leadership archetypes in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14656651
#SPJ1
Explanation:
Law authorization organizations are entrusted with the implementation of the laws in their locale. Police give proactive policing by putting officials on the watch to endeavor to stop wrongdoing before it occurs or is exacerbated. Notwithstanding, by far, most policing is done responsively as officials react to wrongdoings that have happened.
A centralized law authorization organization is one where the law requires the state is sorted out with a headquarters that helps nearby offices.
