the stuff you doing is not easy you need to ask your teacher to help you
Answer:
c) catharsis hypothesis.
Explanation:
If people who have just been aroused by watching rock videos are then insulted, their feelings of anger will be greater than those of people who have been similarly provoked but were not previously aroused. This is best explained by the <u>catharsis hypothesis</u>..
Answer:
1.The closing of the Suez Canal by Egypt in 1956.
2.The OPEC oil embargo in 1973.
Explanation:
Most of the world's oil reserves and supply come from the Middle East. It is estimated that about 64.5 % of the world's oil supply is from the Middle East nations, making it an important aspect of the world's crude oil supply.
If these reserves or supplies were to be stopped or banned by the OPEC nations, or any of these majority supplying nations were to stop their export, then there will be a vast 'disaster' or rather 'crisis' in the nations that depend on these supplies. So, events such as <u>the 1956 closing of the Suez Canal by Egypt or the OPEC oil embargo of 1973 are proof that the Middle East nations could threaten the world's oil supply.
</u>
Thus, the correct answers are options 1 and 2.
<span>The answer you always assume is, "yes". This process is based on an adaption of a decision making process which was developed by Dr. William Glasser, which is a six step process asking the questions, What's my current situation? How do I want my situation to be? Do I have a choice here? What are the possible choices? What's the most likely outcome of each possible choice? and which choice am I going to commit to making?</span>
Answer:
Act utilitarianism
Explanation:
Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action becomes morally right when it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Act utilitarians believe that whenever we are deciding what to do, we should perform the action that will create the greatest net utility.
