Egypt, Libya, and Nigeria all supply oil and petroleum to the U.S.
That's why they are so important to the U.S. economy.
Answer: Oil
Hope this helps :)
Answer: They wanted to use their land for tobacco plantations.
The Natchez are a Native American people from the Lower Mississippi Valley. They spoke a language with no known close relatives, and are noted for being the only Mississippian culture with complex chiefdoms that survived into the colonization period. The Natchez were defeated by French forces around 1730. Today, most descendants of the Natchez live in Oklahoma and South Carolina.
Initially, contact between the Natchez and the Europeans was peaceful. French colonists intermarried with the Native Americans and the French were granted some lands to cultivate. French colonists imported African slaves and cultivated tobacco plants. During the 1710s and 1720s, however, several conflicts arose. These culminated in the French commander Sieur de Chepart's order to vacate the village in order to use the land for a tobacco plantation. This initiated the Natchez Revolt.
The answer is B. Economic.
In sociology, the terms industrial, pastoral, and pre-industrial, are used to describe different types of societies that have existed throughout history. This categorization is based on the main economical activity of a society and there have been pre-industrial societies, and pastoral societies. However, the term economic society doesn't exist because every society, no matter its main economical activity, has had its own economic system.
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
