Answer:
=$15
Explanation:
An economist will consider the cost of the photo as the materials costs plus the opportunity cost of labor for Jessica. For Jessica, the opportunity cost of making the photo frame is the amount she would have earned working at the coffee shop. Therefore, the $10 she would have earned at the coffee shop is the labor cost of producing one photo frame.
The total cost of making one photo frame would be $5 plus $10.
i,e. $5 + $10 = $15
Profit from the photo frame = selling price - cost price
=$30- $15
=$15
Answer:
S/n General journal Debit Credit
a Investment in Sanz County bonds $120,000
Interest $800
(120,000*6%*40/360)
Cash $120,800
(The purchase of the bonds on May 11 plus 40 days of accrued
interest; assume a 360-day year.)
b. Cash $3,600
Interest receivable $800
Interest revenue $2,800
(Semiannual interest on October 1)
c. Cash(150* (99%*30,000) - $100) $29,750
Loss on sale of investments $400
Investment in Sanz County bonds $30,000
Interest revenue $150
(Sale of the bonds on October 31)
d. Interest receivables $1,365
Interest revenue $1,365
(Adjusting entry for accrued interest of $1,365 on
December 31, Year 1.)
Answer: Cost Effectiveness.
Explanation:
Primecoat Corporations is trying to save cost on preparing their annual financial statement. The Corporation is Cost effective in the use of manpower to prepare the financial statement. Cost Effectiveness involves achieving a high output at a little input cost.
Answer:
b) fall to 8 percent.
Explanation:
First, irrespective of the duration of the bond, if the price is equal to the bond's face value, it means that the coupon rate is equal to the yield to maturity (YTM).
Initial YTM = 10%
Since this is a perpetually coupon paying bond, you use PV of perpetuity to find the rate;
PV = Coupon PMT / rate
Given PV as $1,250, new annual rate would be;
1,250 = 100/rate
solve for rate by cross multiplying;
1,250rate = 100
divide both sides by 1,250
rate = 100/1,250
rate = 0.08 or 8%
Therefore, the
interest rate would fall to 8 percent.
Answer:
Explanation:
"I spend more on orange juice even as the price rises".
This implies that orange juice is not an inferior good because people demand less of an inferior product when their prices fall. In this case more is demanded as price rises implying that orange juice is being viewed as a luxury good or healthy drink. Consumers tend to interpret certain price increase positively and view the goods as superior.
Does this mean that I must be violating the law of demand?
YES
Generally, the law of demand states that, "citeris paribus (with all things being equal), as the price of a good rises, quantity demanded falls; conversely, as the price of a good falls, quantity demanded increases".
Therefore if "I spend more on orange juice even as the price rises", then obviously the law of demand is being violated
