I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. <span>Theorists who emphasize the environment in explaining individual differences typically stress the importance of early experiences. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
A taxpayer paying his 10-year-old daughter $50,000 a year for consulting likely violates the constructive receipt doctrine.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
constructive receipt doctrine.?</h3>
Generally, When a money taxpayer receives gross income for federal income tax purposes, the theory of constructive receipt is applied to make this determination.
If a taxpayer has complete discretion over deciding when certain types of income will or should be paid, that person is liable for tax in the current year.
In conclusion, If a taxpayer gives his daughter, who is only ten years old, fifty thousand dollars a year for consulting work, the taxpayer has most certainly violated the constructive receipt law.
Read more about the constructive receipt doctrine.
brainly.com/question/15961692
#SPJ1
22,938 is what he should pay for the annuity.
Given;
Pv = 5000
r = 4.5
n = 5
Formula of Annuity payment is; P = r(PV) / 1 - (1 + r)^-n
= 5000 * 0.045 / 1 - (1+0.045)^-5
= 22,938
Just follow the formula of the annuity payment and you can get the final answer you are looking for. The answer in this question is $22,938
Answer:
Quantity of beef demanded will decrease by 12%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Price elasticity of demand for beef, Ed = 0.60
Increase in the price of beef = 20%
Now,
Price elasticity of demand for beef,
Ed = [ Percentage change in Quantity ] ÷ [ Percentage change in price ]
or
0.60 = [ Percentage change in Quantity ] ÷ 20%
or
Percentage change in Quantity = 0.60 × 20%
or
Percentage change in Quantity = 12%
Also,
Price and Quantity are inversely proportional
Hence,
With the increase in price, the quantity will decrease
Therefore,
Quantity of beef demanded will decrease by 12%