You can go to local authorities depending how they react is all dependent on if the corruption that is reported is violent
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
A court assumes that the written cntarct is the begining and the end of all the terms of the agreement and will not acept the parol evidence if it changes the meaning of the terms of contract.
Parol evidence should only be used to determine the inetntions of the parties at the time the contract was made, not after the fact.
Valid contract: The elemenst of valid contract must be seen.
Since Mrs B signed a contract with the specific terms that did not include a bonus, a court would not consider an oral agreement based on completing a yet to be written contract under the parol evidence rule.
hence, Mrs B cannot introduce the oral agreement under the parol evidence rule.
Answer:
$13,529= Direct material
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Job 590 has a total cost of $29,200. It has been charged with manufacturing overhead costs of $7200. The rate is 85% of direct labor.
Total cost= direct material + direct labor + allocated overhead
29,200= DM + (7,200/0.85) + 7,200
29,200 - 7,200 - 8471= dm
$13,529= DM
False, The whole point of G-20 is to set policies that are effective
Answer:
The Rex’s gross income from the partnership in 2019 and 2020 is $1,20,000 and $1,80,000 respectively
Explanation:
The computation of the gross income for each year is shown below:
In 2019:
Gross income = Taxable income × percentage of interest in profits
= $400,000 × 30%
= $1,20,000
In 2020:
Gross income = Taxable income × percentage of interest in profits
= $600,000 × 30%
= $1,80,000
The withdrawn amount is not consider for computing the gross income. So, we ignored it
