1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GenaCL600 [577]
3 years ago
7

Joe, Patrick, and Adam are friends. They have the same preference over consumption and leisure. Joe has two jobs. He auditions f

or sitcoms during daytime and works at CVS at night time. Patrick works from 9 to 5 as a curator at a local museum. Adam is a partner of a law firm and works over time almost every week. Clearly both Joe and Adam work more than Patrick. This is because:_______ 1. in both cases income effect dominates. 2. for Joe income effect dominates while for Adam substitution effect dominates. 3. for Joe substitution effect dominates while for Adam income effect dominates. 4. in both cases substitution effect dominates
Business
1 answer:
Roman55 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

2. For Joe income effect dominates while for Adam substitution effect dominates

Explanation:

Income effect refers to change in the real i.e inflation adjusted income when prices change.

In the given case, Joe works at two jobs which means that for a greater income he is willing to work for more hours. Thus, in his case it can be said that income effect is prominent.

In the case of Adam, he works overtime regularly which means for every extra hour of work, he earns an extra income. This represents change in the relative income owing to change in working habits. This is a case of substitution effect.

You might be interested in
Put autoimmune in a sentence
Inga [223]
Every day, Scientists work hard to come up with cures for auto immune disease; like rheumatoid arthritis. 
5 0
3 years ago
Suppose you invest 60% of your portfolio in campbell soup and 40% in boeing. the expected dollar return on your campbell soup st
DiKsa [7]
<span>Boeing stock has increased to about 41.4% while Campbell soup has decreased to about 58.5%. This is because Boeing's rate of return was significantly higher than Campbell's soup, therefore with the returns added in, the portion of the portfolio that is invested in Boeing has increased.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Owens Corning has total assets of $800,000, long-term debt of $240,000, stockholders' equity of $350,000, and current liabilitie
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

$50,800

Explanation:

Increase in assets = Current Assets * Percentage change in sales = $800,000 * 20% = $160,000

Increase in current liabilities = Current liabilities * Percentage change in sales = $210,000 * 20% = $42,000

Increase in retaned earning = Increased sales*Profit Margin*Retention ratio = $1,000,000*120%*8%*(1-0.30) = $67,200

External financing need = Increase in Assets - Increase in liabilities - Increase in retained earning

External financing need = $160,000 - $42,000 - $67,200

External financing need = $50,800

5 0
3 years ago
Windsor, Inc. sells merchandise on account for $3700 to Morton Company with credit terms of 2/10, n/30. Morton Company returns $
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

Dr. Cash                          $2,842

Dr. Discount Expense    $58

Cr. Account Receivable $2,900

Explanation:

Terms 2/10, n/30 means there is a discount of 2% is available on payment of due amount within discount period of 10 days after sale with net credit period of 30 days.

Sales = $3,700

Returns = $800

Amount Due = $3,700 - $800 = $2,900

As the payment is made within discount period, so discount will be availed

Discount = $2,900 x 2% = $58

Cash Paid = $2,900 - $58 = $2,842

7 0
3 years ago
Quinn contracts to provide ten tons of scrap steel at $500 per ton to Rendered Materials, Inc. An unforeseen shortage of scrap s
solong [7]

Answer:

C) ​performance of the contract is commercially impracticable.

Explanation:

Contract law contemplates certain situations where performing the contract is either difficult or impossible and therefore the party is not liable for breaching the contract.

Commercial impracticability applies to contracts where the performance of at least one party is impracticable and cannot be accomplished.

In this case, Quinn cannot perform his duty since the price of scrap steel increased beyond any reasonable price contemplated in the contract. Since Quinn is not responsible for setting the price of scrap steel, he is not liable for breaching the contract.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Luana loves shopping for clothes, but considering the state of the economy, she has decided to start saving. At the end of each
    13·1 answer
  • A company has grown in size to the point that it is expanding its operations
    7·2 answers
  • Domain names that end in .edu are:
    7·1 answer
  • Aurora Corporation operated without insurance coverage for the first month of 2018. Then, on February 1, 2018, the company paid
    6·1 answer
  • Before the year​ began, Venus Manufacturing estimated that manufacturing overhead for the year would be $ 175 comma 900 and that
    13·1 answer
  • An increase in input costs in the production of electric automobiles caused the price of electric automobiles to rise. Holding e
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following terms refers to using wooden structures or mechanical or hydraulic systems to support the sides of an exc
    6·2 answers
  • Technical skills are the ability to Multiple choice question. perform tasks such as filing tax forms or assembling a keyboard tr
    11·1 answer
  • Firms face competing pressures in the marketplace–how to achieve lower costs through proven approaches to production, while look
    15·2 answers
  • Determine which revision of each the following sentences provides the most clarity.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!