Answer:
c. An account that pays 0.5 %0.5% per month for three years.
Explanation:
We can evaluate all the option using following formula:
EAR = ( 1 + ( r / m ) )^m -1
a.
2.5% every six months for three years
r= 2.5% = 0.025 / 6 =
m = 12/6 = 2
EAR = ( 1 + 0.025 )^2 -1
EAR = 0.050625 = 5.06%
7.5% every 18 months for three years
r= 7.5% for 1.5 years = 7.5% / 18 = 0.4167% per month = 0.004167 per month
EAR = ( 1 + 0.004167 )^12 -1
EAR = 0.051166 = 5.12%
0.5% every month for three years
r= 0.5% = 0.005
EAR = ( 1 + 0.005 )^12 -1
EAR = 0.0616778 = 6.17%
We will prefer an account that pays 0.5 %0.5% per month for three years, it pays the highest return.
Answer:
payback 5 years
if the ltaer years cash flow increases several times, it would not affect the payback date. This is a disavantage of this method, it is focus on recover the investment without considering the total cash flow of the project.
Explanation:
Payback = the time in the life of a project on which the initial ivnestment is recover.
-31,000 Balance
Year 1 2,000 - 29,000
Year 2 0 - 29,000
Year 3 8,000 - 21,000
Year 4 9,000 - 12,000
Year 5 12,000 0
At year 5 the proejct achieve payback
Answer:
It belongs to Alma because Susan abandoned it and Alma took possession of it
Explanation:
By common law, Alma is a person who has found an abandoned property and she may claim it. To do this, she has to take some definite steps to show her claim. Alma can claim this abandoned piece of chair by taking it into her house, or by placing a sign on it to show that she now owns it.
If Susan was to take this to court, the court would determine the kind of item and where it was found to determine if Alma has a right to it. But since it was found in a dump site she now has the right to it.
Explanation:
30th 30th weep 30th rip rip 50mil 480usd
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
Monumental can discharge the contract by frustration. In order for a contract to be discharged by frustration, four conditions have to occur:
- An unforeseeable event must occur: In this case the zoning changes were unforeseeable.
-
No party is at fault: the zoning board made the changes to the zoning of the land.
- Performance is impossible: there is no reason why an office building should be built in a residential only area.
- The result is radically different than expected: neither Monumental or Champion Builders expected a zoning change to occur.
