1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
9

What challenges did the builders of the panama canal faced and how did they overcome them?

History
1 answer:
Mila [183]3 years ago
4 0
<span>The challenges they faced were deadly diseases called malaria and the yellow fever. The way the builders overcame them were because a doctor named Dr. William.</span>
You might be interested in
Should war have rules or restrictions to follow or should soldiers do whatever they need to
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

War should have rules and regulations to follow because if not the soldiers might not focus on their task.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Ati-atihan sinulog festival are celebrated in honor of the blank​
BARSIC [14]

Answer:

Santo Niño

Explanation:

Ati-than Sinulog festival is celebrated in honor of the "Santo Niño."

Santo Niño is the Philippines word for Holy Child or Infant Jesus. The celebration is usually conducted every third Sunday of January. It is usually observed in Kalibo. It is also common around the province of Aklan, Panay Island. Both Christians and Non-Christians joined the festival period.

Hence, the answer to the question is Santo Nino.

7 0
3 years ago
The period immediately after the War of 1812 was known as
gavmur [86]
The Era of Good Feelings.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
(HC)The quote below was written during the 1940s: "The senselessness of all the inactive manpower. . . . [M]en who are able and
asambeis [7]

Answer:

C - the goernment feared that certain groups might work to sabotage and not help the U.S. efforts in the war

Explanation:

This fear the government had regarding minorities, allowed them to not use the manpower to the fullest potential, leading to 'inactive manpower'

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. In a game, if you roll a 6 on a 6-sided number cube, you lose a turn.
    13·2 answers
  • Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson disagreed over the proposed “National Bank” based on which issue?
    9·2 answers
  • Who was The American commander in South Vietnam
    10·2 answers
  • The decision to raise taxes is an example of
    15·1 answer
  • Abolitionists were cautious and not jubilant when lincoln was elected president in 1860 because lincoln
    7·1 answer
  • The boston massacre occured while a group of colonists were arguing with British troops. Why were the colonists arguing with the
    14·2 answers
  • What was used to close the open range
    5·1 answer
  • -Abundant coal resources
    11·1 answer
  • Octavian/Augustus was a ruler<br> during what time period? What did<br> it mean?
    5·1 answer
  • HURRRY!!!! Which best describes a majority of farmers in eastern North Carolina by 1870?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!