Answer:It is important that a jury reflects the racial make - up of the community because so that you wouldn't have a one sided idea on what is going on but a person might feel comfortable with members of his or her community. Or racial makeup of there community so they see that the jury may understand them better.
Explanation:
Hope this helps ツ
Answer:
The long term effects of imperialism on the colonized people are political changes such as changing the government reflect upon European traditions, economic changes that made colonies create resources for factories, and cultural changes that made people convert their religion.
Explanation:
Answer:
Under the terms of the treaty negotiated by Trist, Mexico ceded to the United States Upper California and New Mexico. This was known as the Mexican Cession and included present-day Arizona and New Mexico and parts of Utah, Nevada, and Colorado (see Article V of the treaty).
Answer:
love, brotherhood and harmony to achieve a pluralistic society with cosmopolitan culture
Explanation:
Interfaith Movement refers to positive, generous, cooperative and constructive interaction between people of different faiths, traditions and beliefs. It promotes harmony and love in the society by means of dialogue as well as mutual cooperation at both the individual and institutional levels.
Interfaith largely refers to interaction between followers of Abrahamic religions. Example: Jews, Christians and Muslims.
Since 1960s there have been several institutions set up all over the world to promote the movement:
Temple of Understanding (1960)
World Council of Churches (1961)
Interfaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington ( 1978)
Minhaj-ul-Quran (1981)
All these institutions promoted love, brotherhood and harmony to achieve a pluralistic society with cosmopolitan culture.
Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
