Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data. ... Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false.
I think it's from Myanmar
<u>The U. S. Constitution gives three types of specific powers to the federal government as follows:</u>
- Delegated Powers
- Implied Powers
- Inherent Powers
<u>Explanation:</u>
The federal government was established in with an aim to avoid tyranny, experiment new programs and allowing more participation of common people in politics that may help the country excel.
To accomplish the aims, the constitution sanction a certain set of rules and regulations or what we can term as "Powers" to the federal government as follows;
<u>Delegated Powers</u>
Includes the power to coin money, declare war, raise the armed forces, and regulate commerce
<u>Implied Powers</u>
These powers are not specifically stated in the constitution but termed as "necessary and proper" such as making laws that are necessary and proper for the welfare of the country
<u>Inherent Powers</u>
These powers are not specified in the constitution but grows out of the requirements. Besides this, the constitution also mentioned some reserved powers that are guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment.
Slaves occupied the lowest social class.
If you ever need help with ancient Egypt let me know, I have a whole essay on it.
