Answer:
The missing options are:
A. Potential confounding variables are not always controlled din laboratory studies
.
B. Retention tests employed in laboratory studies are usually once merged with factual information rather than emotions
.
C. The intensity of emotional responses is more accurately measured after the event in laboratory studies
.
D. Memories and emotional experiences as in real life are very different from those generated in laboratory studies.
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
Generalizability measures how useful is what scientists have been studying in a laboratory in comparison with the real-life since the first option is a prototype of reality that can miss valuable variables that can have an impact on the real life. With generalizability, we can see if the results of the investigation and the process that scientists used are useful in real life and can apply to other things or communities. The efficiency of generalizability depends on how well the representation of reality was in the laboratory.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Companies passed on production and transportation costs to consumers</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
An increase in oil prices will add to a higher inflation level. This is on the grounds that transport costs will rise prompting more increased prices for many products. <em>This will be cost-push inflation which is very unique to inflation brought about by rising aggregate excess/demand growth. </em>
Consumers will see a decline in unrestricted income. They bear a higher cost of transportation, yet don't have the compensation of income rise. <em>Higher oil costs can prompt slower economic development – especially an issue if consumer spending is less.</em>
Quantity demand is the demand for goods in a considerable amount or size....
Egyptian art mainly describes architecture, crafts, literature, music and mainly, was closely linked to religion, so it was fairly standardized, not margins to creativity or personal imagination, because the work should reveal a perfect command of techniques and not the style of the artist.
The biggest difference of the art that we see today is the freedom that the present artists have in representing their art, something that was not common at that time. At that time the artists had to follow the artistic pattern.
