Answer:
Reactive devaluation
Explanation:
From the scenario described. It can be observed that the students gave the idea a lower rating because it was coming from the opposing side. Hence, this is am an example of REACTIVE DEVALUATION.
This is because Reactive Devaluation is a term that describes a form of mental bias from one party towards another. This arises when a plan is devalued by party A because the plan comes from party B who is perceived as the opponent.
Hence, in this case, the students' reaction is an example of Reaction Devaluation
Answer:
if-else
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the best statement to use in this situation is an if-else statement. Like mentioned, this is a statement that outputs two different results depending on whether or not the input meets a predefined set of rules.
For Example: Input is 17
if (hour < 18) {
greeting = "Good day";
} else {
greeting = "Good evening";
}
Output would be "Good evening" in this situation
Answer: You have just committed an attributional bias called: fundamental attribution error.
Explanation: attributional bies reffers to errors made when people try to explain their own behaviour or other's people behaviour based on their own analysis of social situations. In this case, it's a fundamental attribution error because Mark is making an assumption on Allison's behaviour not considering the influence of situational factors and overemphasising the role of dispositional factors such as the distraction Allison may have in her current actions.
