Answer:
The correct answer is A) He appeals to the audience's emotions.
Roosevelt supported his position that employees should receive compensations in case of an injury or death in paragraph 4 in that "He appeals to the audience's emotions."
We are referring to US President Theodore Roosevelt's speech about labor legislation, delivered in March 1908. President Roosevelt said: "In addition to a liability law protecting the employees of common carriers, the Government should show its good faith by enacting a further law giving compensation to its own employees for injury or death incurred1 in its service. It is a reproach to us as a Nation that in both Federal and State legislation we have afforded less protection to public and private employees than any other industrial country of the world."
President Roosevelt tried to use Pathos, or the emotional approach to convince his audience.
Explanation:
Answer:
A.) by joining them with a coordinating conjunction
Explanation:
Had to read a lot.
Answer:
The word 'that' is a common word in English that is used in many different manners. Did you notice the use of 'that' in the first sentence? In this case, 'that' was used as a relative pronoun as a compliment. Often 'that' can be used or left out of a sentence entirely.
The word and term 'it' can be used for either a subject or an object in a sentence and can describe any physical or psychological subject and/or object. The genitive form its has been used to refer to human babies and animals
You would need to check how to write the comnparative analysis. In the "lens" (or "keyhole") comparison, in which you weight A less heavily than B, you use A as a lens through which to view B. Just as looking through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, using A as a framework for understanding B changes the way you see B. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of a thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood. Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa. Faced with a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you first state all the features that A and B have in common, and then state all the ways in which A and B are different. Predictably, the thesis of such a paper is usually an assertion that A and B are very similar yet not so similar after all. To write a good compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw data—the similarities and differences you've observed—and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. You may also contact the professionals from Prime Writings and let them do it for you. I am sure you will like the overall experience.
I think that you would have to add commas in each of the sentences, is they how they are written? Did you take the punctuation out?
