complete question:
The sum of the digits of a two-digit numeral is 8. If the digits are reversed, the new number is 18 greater than the original number. How do you find the original numeral?
Answer:
The original number is 10a + b = 10 × 3 + 5 = 35
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
the number = ab
a occupies the tens place while b occupies the unit place. Therefore,
10a + b
The sum of the digits of two-digits numeral
a + b = 8..........(i)
If the digits are reversed. The reverse digit will be 10b + a. The new number is 18 greater than the original number.
Therefore,
10b + a = 18 + 10a + b
10b - b + a - 10a = 18
9b - 9a = 18
divide both sides by 9
b - a = 2...............(ii)
a + b = 8..........(i)
b - a = 2...............(ii)
b = 2 + a from equation (ii)
Insert the value of b in equation (i)
a + (2 + a) = 8
2a + 2 = 8
2a = 6
a = 6/2
a = 3
Insert the value of a in equation(ii)
b - 3 = 2
b = 2 + 3
b = 5
The original number is 10a + b = 10 × 3 + 5 = 35
You would do:
10.32/8 = 1.29
Therefore, the rate of cost per download is $1.29
Answer:
-30=-30
Step-by-step explanation:
Always true.
Answer:
Melanie.
Step-by-step explanation:
The possible ways of getting a 6 are (3,3), (2,4), (4,2), (1,5) and (5,1).
That is 5 ways.
The possible ways of getting a 7 are (1,6), (6,1), (5,2),( 2,5), (3, 4), (4,3).
That is 6 ways.
So Melanie made the better decision.
There really is no single "obvious" choice here...
Possibly the sequence is periodic, with seven copies of -1 followed by six copies of 0, or perhaps seven -1s and seven 0s. Or maybe seven -1s, followed by six 0s, then five 1s, and so on, but after a certain point it would seem we have to have negative copies of a number, which is meaningless.
Or maybe it's not periodic, and every seventh value in the sequence is incremented by 1? Who knows?
I'll go ahead and assume the latter case, that the sequence is not periodic, since that's technically somewhat easier to manage. We can assign the following rule to the

-th term in the sequence:


for

.
So the generating function for this sequence might be

As to what is meant by "closed form", I'm not sure. Would this answer be acceptable? Or do you need to find a possibly more tractable form for the coefficient not in terms of the floor function?