do you still need help? if you do then During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers.but the relationship between the two nations was a diffaconld ostwar Soviet expansionism in the Eastern Europe fueled many of the Americans' fear of a Russian planning to control the world
Answer:
At the First Continental Congress, it was decided to boycott all British goods and prepare for possible military action.
Explanation:
The First Continental Congress was a gathering of delegates appointed by the regional assemblies of the Thirteen Colonies in British North America in 1774. It only met briefly and then prepared his successor, the Second Continental Congress, which organized the American Revolutionary War. The two assemblies together formed the Continental Congress, which acted as the first de facto government in the United States. The First Continental Congress met in Philadelphia and had 56 members representing all colonies except Georgia.
Like the Stamp Act Congress, in which American colonists gathered to oppose the Stamp Act, the occasion for the First Continental Congress was the response to the Intolerable Acts of the British Crown.
During his meeting, the Congress achieved two major successes. The first was the commitment of the colonies to boycott British goods as of December 1, 1774. As a result, the total volume of imports from Great Britain fell by 97 percent in 1775. If the intolerable acts were not abolished, the colonies would no longer deliver to Great Britain after September 10, 1775.
The second success of the congress was the preparation of the Second Continental Congress, which was to be held on May 10, 1775.
A physical map could show you that
The US has typically benefited greatly from immigration. The most notable citizens of the US often came to the country as immigrants or first-generation citizens. In order to create a very open and happy culture that encouraged independence and ambition, we combined elements of the British core culture with the Nordic work ethic and values, the Irish mischief and love of the underdog, the Italian and Spanish influences, as well as those of the African, Chinese, and Mexican immigrants.
However, there have been instances when having too many immigrants has seriously affected the US. It has sparked several recessions and deflations. For instance, a rush of immigrants starting in the 1870s outpaced our ability to assimilate them, contributing significantly to the slump of 1890. Even worse, people were congregating in ethnic ghettos, which was seriously harming the country and destroying the pay scale, leading to an almost complete economic collapse. Similar trends are being observed with the influx of refugees and illegal immigrants into the US. Our economy is being destroyed by a lack of integration, ethnic ghettos, and labor excess, and national unity is hanging by a thread as a result.
Westward Expansion undoubtedly had something to do with immigration. At that time, the nation was experiencing a massive influx of immigration, which essentially compelled an expansion in order to provide immigrants and settlers with sufficient housing. I think the Westward Expansion would have taken place whether there had been an inflow of immigrants or not. Immigration made a significant contribution to the economy's and society's variety. The trading environment will undergo a significant transformation during this time due to the new skill sets that were coming from varied ethnicities. Without immigration, Westward Expansion certainly would have been conceivable. Earlier than immigration began to rise, colonists and settlers were already relocating west.
Thank you,
Eddie
