Answer:
Student: Sir, should we make a statistical assessment of the results of the project?
CS teacher: I believe so, but I would like to see the results first and read the summary of your project, to indicate the best evaluation.
Student: If it is not necessary, I believe that we can finalize the project. Perhaps we can present it at the university's next science and technology symposium.
CS teacher: Send me what you've done so far, so I can evaluate it better. In addition, I need you to review the delivery dates for articles from the university magazine, to see if we can publish an article for this project.
Student: I'll see that right now.
CS teacher: Thank you.
Explanation:
The dialogue above was made between a student and a CS teacher about the completion of a project. This dialogue involves the evaluation of results and the publication of possible articles, in addition to the presentation of the same.
The dialogue was done in a fast, direct and clear language, as it should be between students and teachers busy with projects and dates and other bureaucracies in the academic environment.
It is the presence of god
Answer:
An argument should take a stance about a particular point of view, thesis, or claim.
Explanation:
Answer:
Wild woodland fires cause broad harm to widely varied vegetation and can kill and harm people not just people but nature and the animals. During the time spent controlled consumption, a few wild creatures are killed and lose their natural surroundings, so they have nowhere to live. The thick smoke from the man-made flames is additionally a worry for the creatures. I would think that having the controlled flames to secure wild zones because we shouldn't lose regard for those zones, this planet should be safe not only for us humans, but for any living thing in this world.
Explanation:
hope this help :) its not much but some :D
