The answers are fraud and medical malpractice. Are there choices to choose from? Because a doctor can also be charged with murder. It is called medical malpractice whenever a patient sued a doctor for negligence in medical treatment.
Given what we know, we can confirm that the situation described in the question accurately depicts the use of the educational principle of transference.
<h3>What is the educational principle of transference?</h3>
- This principle involves using prior knowledge to complete a job.
- To use this principle, the individual in question will draw on the knowledge they have acquired previously and apply it to their job.
- This is the case in the question given since the student is applying knowledge of pathophysiology and nursing practice theory previously learned to create a treatment plan.
Therefore, given that transference is the ability to take the knowledge we have acquired previously and apply it to the job at hand, we can confirm that the situation in the question accurately describes the use of this principle.
To learn more about learning principles visit:
brainly.com/question/20344473?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
In this protein supplement there are 11 grams of protein which contribute with 44 kcalories. Therefore, the percentage of kcalories coming from protein in this particular supplement is 28,5 %.
Explanation:
Each gram of protein contributes 4 kcal (calories), so 11 grams of proteins x 4 kcal/gram = 44 kcal.
The total amount of kcalories is 154, so 44 kcal / 154 kcal x 100 = 28,5%.
When it comes to protein supplements is very important to realise how many proteins are being consumed and how many total calories this supplement has, for the simple reason that it might be not help to reach the protein goal for a particular individual, but instead, it might be providing too many calories that come from non-protein compounds.
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
Answer:
In my opinion, NEVER.
Explanation:
You just cannot risk it. It's better to say safe than sorry.
