The principle of ends explain that second formulation of the categorical imperative may be interpreted as requiring that we always respect human rationality.
<h3>What is the principle of ends?</h3>
The principle of ends refers to the second formulation of the categorical imperative.
And this explains that one should treat humanity with all efforts because no one knows about the end.
Learn more about principle of ends at;
brainly.com/question/10218961
Hey there!
Erik Erikson developed and proposed 8 p<span>sychosocial stages of life. These, in order, are trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. shame, initiative vs. guilt, industry vs. inferiority, ego identity vs. role confusion, intimacy vs. isolation, generativity vs. stagnation, and ego integrity vs. despair.
It sounds like the last one, ego integrity vs. despair, is described in your problem. The last stage begins around maturity, or 65, and goes on until death. At this stage, people are often retiring or are retired, and start pondering the things they didn't do with their lives. This leads to regret about not doing certain things that they once hoped to do, or maybe didn't even realize they wanted to do at the time. They think that it's too late now, and start feeling dissatisfied with their life, as your question describes.
Hope this helped you out! :-)</span>
Answer:
The statement that describes a disadvantage of the island location of Japan’s is:
B.) trade in contact with other nations are limited Because of Japan’s island location
Explanation:
To understand this answer we need to analyze all the options. First of all, a) it is talking about the advantage to remain closed from foreign influences. So it is incorrect. c) It talks about how being surrounded by the sea made them able to exploit them for resources. d) it explains how japan has natural barriers that protected it from foreign incursions. Therefore the only correct statement is b) because it follows the intention of showing off a disadvantage.
Answer:
If each suspected drug dealer follows a dominant strategy, he/she should -<em> a. confess regardless of the partner's decision</em>
Explanation:
In game theory, one player would be displaying<u> strategic dominance</u> <u>if he or she chooses a </u><u>dominant strategy</u><u>, which promises a better outcome for this player regardless of the strategy chosen by the player he or she is playing against.</u>
Here, each suspected drug dealer will have a better outcome if he/she confesses and testifies against his/her partner, because in result he/she gets the best possible outcome - immunity.
Nosotros mismos, y dios pero mas nosotros. porque tomamos nuestras propias decisiones y somos los que nos vamos a comprometer con lo que decidamos
