Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
3(4x+5)+2
3•4x=12x
5•3=15+2=17
Answer= 12x + 17
- Length (l) = 45 m
- Breadth (b) = 30 m
- We know, perimeter of a rectangle = 2(length + breadth)
- Therefore, perimeter of the rectangle
- = 2(I + b)
- = 2(45 + 30) m
- = 2 × 75 m
- = 150 m
- So, the distance travelled by Rubina
- = 4 × 150 m
- = 600 m
<u>Answer:</u>
<em><u>The </u></em><em><u>distance </u></em><em><u>travelled</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>by </u></em><em><u>Rubina </u></em><em><u>is </u></em><em><u>6</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>m.</u></em>
Hope you could get an idea from here.
Doubt clarification - use comment section.
Answer:
f(x) = 4(x - 8)
4 (10 -8) = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
