Answer:
d. disparate treatment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that this scenario best illustrates disparate treatment. This refers to discriminating a potential employee based on any protected characteristic (age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, marriage) even though they are just as suited or qualified as any other candidate or employee.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Henry is the intended beneficiary of the insurance policy and as such, he is bound to the time limitations and all the other clauses included in the contract.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties that can benefit from a contract. Third parties are not part of the contract and may not even know that they were included as beneficiaries in it, but they are bound by all the legal clauses included in the contract. They must be included in the contract and all the benefits they might obtain have to be explicitly established.
Answer:
a. The true cost of something in its cost of opportunity
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the cost which is defined as the cost or expense of one item which is lost in order to get the opportunity to do or to consume something else. In simple words, it is the value or the cost of the next best available alternative.
So, when the person select to bought the textbooks through Chegg instead paying the higher price for the same books through the bookstore. Under this situation, the principle applies is the cost of something in its opportunity cost.
