If Africans waged war against other nations, the other nations that won would enslave the people and sell them on the market. If they waged war between themselves, the stronger tribes would enslave the weaker tribes and sell them to the slave market even though they are more or less neighbors.
Who was sold into enslavement after a local or tribal war?
Answer: African were sold into enslavement after a local or tribal war. There were slaves in africa even before the white man came. It was most visible after the war was over and the conqueror was decided.
The correct solution will be "the global village".
Explanation:
The terminology becomes readily employed currently by authors, journalists, government, and political relations people in particular to illustrate the decreasing differences amongst nations via the internet, cell phones, and cheap airline tickets, and perhaps even the fact whether information moves with either the maximum possible speed across the planet.
Even though they are highly improbable to refuse to acknowledge the opportunities for creating and distributing "massive international" globally.
This is False. It's False because by definition, values which are three standard deviations are less likely than values that are two standard deviations - if we're talking about the Gaussian/normal distribution that is.
A writer of a call option will want the value of the underlying asset to <u>decrease</u> and a buyer of a put option will want the value of the underlying asset to <u>decrease</u>. The writer of the call option who is also the seller of the put option will want the value of the underlying asset which is the financial assets upon which a derivative's price is based to decrease so as to make more profit while the buyer also wants it to decrease so he/she can pay less for the asset.
