This question has been answered already. Before you ask a question check to see if it has already been answered. Answer:brainly.com/question/12736667
This technique is known as Foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a way of having a person to furnish or follow a big request with the aid of using to begin with making small or modest requests.
The approach is primarily based totally at the good judgment that if a respondent (the individual being requested) can furnish an preliminary small or modest request, then the respondent might be maximum probable to later furnish a bigger request that he/she (the respondent) might now no longer have granted if requested outright (with out being approached with small requests first).
To learn more about foot-in-the-door phenomenon, click here:
brainly.com/question/15745551
#SPJ4
Answer:
(A) They created metal items such as containers, weapons, and tools.
Answer:
Humanists believe that human experience and rational thinking provide the only source of both knowledge and a moral code to live by. Humanism is a democratic and ethical life stance, which affirms that human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives.
Humanism affected the artistic community and how artists were perceived. While medieval society viewed artists as servants and craftspeople, Renaissance artists were trained intellectuals, and their art reflected this newfound point of view.
Explanation:
*NO COPY RIGHT OR PLRAGIRISM*
Alright here’s what I suggest you do when writing (really all essays) this essay. Works well for me,especially when I don’t like the topic.
-Game plan-
Intro: The introduction is easy, just get the key elements in such as a hook at the beginning (something interesting about your subject to get the reader invested) and a thesis at the end (run down of what your going to talk about in the next 3 paragraphs)
Paragraph 1: talk about the effects of a presidential system. What this means, how it works, pros and cons. Use at least 1 piece of evidence from a source and then talk about it. (Evidence is really good if you need to fluff up your essay a little)
Paragraph 2: talk about parliamentary system. Answer all of the questions in the previous paragraph. Pros and cons. Again, one piece of evidence. Don’t be afraid to fluff it up a little.
Paragraph 3: compare the two. Which in YOUR OPINION is better. Go into detail with which you would choose. Pick your best piece of evidence about the system you chose to back you up. Be VERY FLUFFY with your word choice.
Conclusion: super easy, just summarize your introduction but add more detail about your opinion. Sum it up with something witty you found in your research. Make yourself sound like the smartest person in the world.
Hope this helps!
