Answer:
He meant that the doctrine created by Fergusson was unconstitutional and was not vitiated by the country's legal undertones.
Explanation:
Ferguson created the “separate but equal” doctrine to maintain racial segregation in the country in a masked way. He claimed that this doctrine allowed public spaces to be separated between whites and blacks, but spaces destined for blacks had the same quality as spaces separated from whites. Thus, according to him, whites would not be forced to mix with blacks.
However, Judge Harlan stated that this doctrine was unconstitutional and that it was against the objectives of the American government, as it maintained a discriminatory and discriminatory nature and therefore would not be proven.
As civilized citizens, we have to agree with Harlan as this doctrine encourages racism that must be suppressed and not encouraged.
Explanation:
it's called a claim you first stake it out and then send papers for it
<span>The cause of the Dawes Act was the complete takeover of most of the land of the Native American Indians. Because of this, land belonged to entire tribes, but not individuals. The Dawes Act was created in 1887 to allow surveys of tribal lands and then division of it so that allotments could be given to individual Native American Indians. The Dawes Act was amended twice, both in 1891 and again in 1906. The effect of the Dawes Act was a complete breakdown of the Native American tribes and their traditional way of life. Only the richer clans or families were given land allotments of crop lands. This led to homelessness of many Native American Indians.</span>
What are the words so i can help you
