Answer:
do you mean the video game tanka?
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
d. is the result of genetic drift
Explanation:
The Homo floresiensis is a small hominid species that lived on the island of Flores, Indonesia. It has been debated a lot about Homo floresiensis, is it Homo sapiens that shrunk in size because of the conditions, or is it a separate hominid species. The general consensus nowadays is that Homo floresiensis is a separate species of hominid, and this has been based on anatomical and genetic analyses. This species of hominid is very interesting as it only grew to a height of 1.1 meters, was sing tools, but it also lived for some time along side the Homo sapiens, meaning that our species had encountered these small hominids.
Early short films that focused on everyday life and did not assume a narrative format were called actualities.
Actualities were non-fiction films, usually no longer than 1-2 minutes, featuring raw, unstructured images of real-life events, places, people, or things. Documentary film's predecessor, actualities, was a popular form of entertainment from the early 1890s until about 1908.
In fact, actualities predated the emergence of documentary cinema. They were compiled into programs by exhibitors – as popular and prominent as their fictional counterparts. It wasn't as clear as it was after it was in formal form. Alongside the travel reality genre, actualities is a film genre strongly associated with still images.
Around 1908, despite the declining topicality of the film genre, there is still talk of the actualities as a component of documentary filmmaking.
Know more about actualities here
brainly.com/question/14375694
#SPJ4
Answer:
First part - earthquakes
second part - after shocks
third part - Tsunamis
Explanation:
Thank you for the points and please mark me brainliest!
