A cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a(n): Sunk costs
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are
Sunk costs?</h3>
Generally, A cost that has already been incurred but cannot be recouped is referred to as a "sunk cost" in economics and the process of making business decisions. In contrast to sunk costs, prospective costs are future expenses that might be avoided if action is done, while sunk costs have already been incurred.
In conclusion, A cost that was incurred in the past but is not relevant to any choice that is being made at this time is considered to be a(n): Incurred expenses
Read more about Sunk costs
brainly.com/question/20438089
#SPJ1
Explanation:
The journal entries are as follows
a.
Merchandise Inventory A/c $254,500
To Accounts payable A/c $254,500
(Being merchandise purchased on credit)
b.
Account payable Dr $30,000
To Merchandise inventory $30,000
(Being the merchandise returned is recorded)
c.
Account payable Dr $224,500 ($254,500 - $30,000)
To Cash $224,500
(Being the payment of the invoice is recorded)
I would say I spend about $20
Answer:
9.69%
Explanation:
Given the following :
Net income = $4819
Total asset = $38,200
Taxable income = $6,100
Dividend payout ratio = 30% = 0.3
The internal growth rate is calculated thus ;
(Return on asset × Retention ratio)/[1-(Return on asset × Retention ratio)]
Return on asset = (Net income / total asset)
Return on asset = ($4,819 / $38,200)
Return on asset = 0.12615
Retention ratio = 1 - Dividend payout ratio
Retention ratio = 1 - 0.3 = 0.7
Hence internal growth rate :
(0.12615 × 0.7) / 1 - (0.12615 × 0.7)
0.088305 / 1 - 0.088305
0.088305 / 0.911695
= 0.0968580
= 0.0968580 × 100%
= 9.685%
= 9.69% ( 2 decimal places)
Here is a sizing chart from the Kohl’s website and they sell ASICS
