Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Set A has a peak at 5. It is also skewed to the right. The center is 5.
Set B also has a peak at 5. Is relatively symmetrical. The center is also 5.
(Sorry about those circle in the back of my picture)
Answer: 3/2
==========================================================
Explanation:
Pick any two points on the red line. I'll pick (0,1) and (2,4)
Those coordinates will be plugged into the slope formula below
m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
m = (4 - 1)/(2 - 0)
m = 3/2
This means we go up 3 and over to the right 2 when traveling along this red line.
Answer:
13
Step-by-step explanation:
65 divided by 5
Answer:$210
Step-by-step explanation: 7% of $1000 = $70 x 3yrs =$210
