All categories

4 years ago

Selecting a sample of paid notes and tracing interest to the general ledger account is a test of the PCAOB assertion for

Business

1 answer:

Sphinxa [80]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

C.completeness

Explanation:

Occurrence means transactions and events that have been recorded or disclosed have occurred and relate to the entity.Existence means whether or not accounts balances and related disclosures related Assets, liabilities and equity interests exist in the financial statements.

Completeness means there are no unrecorded transactions, events and disclosures and all transactions that have occurred has been included in the general ledger/financial statements

Valuation or allocation means that assets, liabilities and equity interests are included in the financial statements at appropriate amounts and any resulting valuation or allocation adjustments are appropriately recorded and related disclosures have been appropriately measured and described.

In this question, interest on sample of paid notes have been traced to the general ledger account, to check that whether the interest on the selected sample has been included in the general ledger and financial statements.Thus the answer shall be C.completeness

You might be interested in

Agreement and disagreement among economists

r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer and Explanation:

The disagreement arise between this economist is due to the differences in the scientific judgements as they disagree due to the various scientific judgements. And, despite their differences, the proposition of two economists should be chosen at random as the tariff and import quotas normally decreased the economic welfare as it always result in deadweight loss and in this both economist should be agree for the same

4 0

3 years ago

Wells Company reports the following sales forecast: September, $55,000; October, $66,000; and November, $80,000. All sales are o

irakobra [83]

Answer:

Total= $65,100

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Wells Company reports the following sales forecast: September, $55,000; October, $66,000; and November, $80,000.

Collections of credit sales are received as follows: 25% in the month of sale, 60% in the first month after sale, and 10% in the second month after sale. 5% of all credit sales are written off as uncollectible.

Cash collection November:

November= 80,000*0.25= 20,000

From October= 66,000*0.6= 39,600

From September= 55,000*0.10= 5,500

Total= $65,100

4 0

4 years ago

An investment has an installed cost of $534,800. The cash flows over the four-year life of the investment are projected to be $2

ale4655 [162]

Solution and Explanation:

(a)-NPV if the Discount Rate is Zero

If the Discount Rate is Zero, the NPV of the Project is the sum of the Future cash flows deducted by Initial Investment

Net Present Value (NPV) $=-\$ 534,800+\$ 214,850+\$ 231,450+\$ 198,110+\$ 146,820$

= $256,430

If the Discount Rate is Zero, The NPV will be $256,430”

(b)- NPV If the discount rate is infinite

If the Discount Rate is Infinite, the NPV of the Project is the Initial Investment

NPV = -$534,800 (Negative)

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose that the market demand curve for bean sprouts is given by P = 1,660 - 4Q, where P is the price and Q is total industry o

a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

In equilibrium, total output by the two firms will be option e= 300.

Q = $q_{1}$ + $q_{2}$

Q = 100 + 200

Q = 300

Explanation:

Data Given:

Market Demand Curve = P = 1660-4Q

where, P = price and Q = total industry output

Each firm's marginal cost = $60 per unit of output

So, we know that Q = $q_{1}$ + $q_{2}$

where $q_{}$ being the individual firm output.

Solution:

P = 1660-4Q

P = 1660- 4( $q_{1}$ + $q_{2}$ )

P = 1660 - 4 $q_{1}$ - 4 $q_{2}$

Including the marginal cost of firm 1 and multiplying the whole equation by $q_{1}$

Let's suppose new equation is X

X = 1660 $q_{1}$ - 4 $q_{1} ^{2}$ - 4 $q_{1}$ $q_{2}$ - 60 $q_{1}$

Taking the derivative w.r.t to $q_{1}$ , we will get:

$X^{'}$ = 1660 - 8 $q_{1}$ - 4 $q_{2}$ - 60 = 0

Making rearrangements into the equation:

8 $q_{1}$ + $q_{2}$ = 1660 - 60

8 $q_{1}$ + $q_{2}$ = 1600

Dividing the whole equation by 4

2 $q_{1}$ + $q_{2}$ = 400

Solving for $q_{1}$

2 $q_{1}$ = 400 - $q_{2}$

$q_{1}$ = 200 - 0.5 $q_{2}$

Including the marginal cost of firm 1 and multiplying the whole equation by $q_{2}$

P = 1660 - 4 $q_{1}$ - 4 $q_{2}$

Let's suppose new equation is Y

Y = 1660 $q_{2}$ - 4 $q_{1}$ $q_{2}$ -4 $q_{2} ^{2}$ - 60 $q_{2}$

Pugging in the value of $q_{1}$

Y = 1660 $q_{2}$ - 4 $q_{2}$ (200 - 0.5 $q_{2}$ ) -4 $q_{2} ^{2}$ - 60 $q_{2}$

Y = 1660 $q_{2}$ - 800 $q_{2}$ +2 $q_{2} ^{2}$ -4 $q_{2} ^{2}$ - 60 $q_{2}$

Y = 1600 $q_{2}$ - 800 $q_{2}$ -2 $q_{2} ^{2}$

Taking the derivative w.r.t $q_{2}$

$Y^{'}$ = 1600 - 800 - 4 $q_{2}$ = 0

Solving for $q_{2}$

4 $q_{2}$ = 800

$q_{2}$ = 200

$q_{1}$ = 200 - 0.5 $q_{2}$

Plugging in the value of $q_{2}$ to get the value of $q_{1}$

$q_{1}$ = 200 - 0.5 (200)

$q_{1}$ = 200 - 100

$q_{1}$ = 100

Q = $q_{1}$ + $q_{2}$

Q = 100 + 200

Q = 300

Hence, in equilibrium, total output by the two firms will be option

e= 300.

5 0

3 years ago

True or false: strength machines are generally regarded as superior to free weights for improving core stability and coordinatio

Levart [38]

The answer to your question would be false

6 0

4 years ago