In a franchise, the franchisor allows the franchisee to trade under its name and see its products for a fee The franchisee pays an original fee to franchisor and a
percentage of its profit for the privilege.So,since, Dunkin' Doughnuts is sharing its' brand name and image with David Ungar(his franchisee) it would definately want to improve it...at the least maintain it...David too is right on the other hand as there can be a possibility that he wants to use ingredients of a much higher quality than that provided.But dunkin' doughnuts can't still allow to do that as it has other franchisees to look after.Imagine that=>all the franchisees of dunkin' doughnuts use different ingredients with different quality..wouldn't this affects the image of the franchisor...also all the food items they sell will have a different taste depending on the ingredients.And if one of the franchisee buys cheap ingredients... thereby producing low quality out put ..the customers will not be satisfied...this will not only affect that franchisee but also the Brand image of the whole business worldwide.
To conclude,David may not be wrong with his idea but since dunkin' doughnuts is a big business with a good brand image...it has its' terms and requirements.
Answer:
d. a palter
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Kant would call this misleading statement a palter. This term refers to a statement that has been made ambiguous in order to hide the truth from someone or in order to avoid committing yourself to something. Which in this scenario "You" are trying to hide the fact that Bill is playing "hooky" from your boss.
The anticholinergic psychedelics increases pupil size and
increase heart rate, respectively.
Deliriants are a class of hallucinogen.
The term was introduced by David
F. Duncan and Robert
S. Gold to distinguish these drugs from psychedelics and dissociatives,
such as LSD and ketamine respectively,
due to their primary effect of causing delirium, as
opposed to the more lucid states produced by other hallucinogens (psychedelics
and dissociatives).
Answer: younger; older
Explanation:
Anthony is most likely younger as he still sees fulfillment when he gets a good salary and benefits from a good job while Henry is older, having set up a firm, values his employees and how the work is done.
Answer:
Present value = $428571.4286 rounded off to $428571.43
Explanation:
To determine how much should be paid for the policy today, we must calculate the present value of perpetuity. The policy returns are in the form of a perpetuity as they are paid in a constant amount after equal intervals of time and for an indefinite time period. The formula for the present value of perpetuity is,
Present value = Cash flows / r
Where,
- r is the required rate of return
Present value = 27000 / 0.063
Present value = $428571.4286 rounded off to $428571.43
