All categories

3 years ago

A party to a lawsuit that has an actual stake in the outcome of the case has:

2 answers:

7 0

This is called standing or locus standing. This is where a party can sufficiently demonstrate a connection to a case. That any result would affect him. The gravity of the outcome would depend on the amount of involvement the party is to the case.

MrMuchimi3 years ago

3 0

I believe the answer is Legal standing.
People who had a legal standing are the one that will recieve either harm or benefit after a decision is made.
The amount of involvement that certain parties had in the case will determine how much involvement the party is allowed to influence the case.

You might be interested in

Sen Corporation warrants carry the right to buy 6 shares of Sen common stock at $10.00 per share. The common stock has a current

Advocard [28]

Answer: $25.50

Explanation:

Intrinsic Value of warrant = Number of shares buyable * (Market price - Warrant price)

= 6 * (14.25 - 10)

= $25.50

8 0

3 years ago

On October 1, 2017 Bartley Corporation issued 5%, 10-year bonds with a face value of $8,000,000 at 103. Interest is paid on Octo

loris [4]

Answer and Explanation:

The journal entry to record the issuance of the bonds is shown below:

Cash Dr ($8,000,000 × 1.03) $8,240,000

To Bond payable $8,000,000

To Premium on bond payable $240,000

(Being issuance of the bond is recorded)

Here cash is debited as it increased the asset and credited the bond payable and the premium on bond payable as it increased the liabilities

Hence, the same is to be considered

6 0

2 years ago

The city of New Orleans has 200 advertising companies, 199 of which employ designers of normal ability at a salary of $100,000 a

zepelin [54]

Answer:

a. $700,000

b. 6/7 or 85.7%

c. No they will not.

Explanation:

a. Jacobs will earn the normal salary that the other designers in the other companies are getting in addition to the incremental income he brings to the company as a result of his talents.

Incremental income = Revenue with Jacobs - Revenue without Jacobs

= 1,000,000 - 400,000

= $600,000

Jacobs earnings = Normal designer earnings + incremental income

= 100,000 + 600,000

= $700,000

b. Economic rent is the excess amount that the company is paying Jacobs over what it should normally cost to get a designer.

Normal cost of designer is $100,000. Company is therefore paying an economic rent of $600,000.

Proportion of Jacobs salary that is economic rent = $\frac{Economic rent}{Jacobs annual earning}$

= $\frac{600,000}{700,000}$

= 6/7 or 85.7%

c. The company hiring Jacobs will not be making an economic profit because for them to make an economic profit they would have to be making more than the $400,000 that the other firms make. They cannot make this amount because for them to do so they would have to reduce the amount they pay Jacobs. If they do so, Jacobs would leave for greener pastures and then they would be making the same $400,000 that the rest are making.

8 0

3 years ago

Jorge considers himself a risk-averse person. He takes the opportunity to switch to a new job where there are two possible outco

Lunna [17]

Answer:

Jorge is not risk-averse

Explanation:

Risk averse means to reluctant to take risk

Since theres a 80% chance that Jorge will get laid off and end up with a job that will pay him $10000 less is very risky instead where he'll earn $30000 where the chance is 20% that he'll get the job.

5 0

3 years ago

Angelina's made two announcements concerning its common stock today. First, the company announced that its next annual dividend

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

Explanation:

according to the constant dividend growth model

price = d1 / (r - g)

d1 = next dividend to be paid

r = cost of equity

g = growth rate

2.2 / 0.1 - 0.05 = 44

6 0

3 years ago